PWA

Progressive Web Apps and Mobile Apps

Jul 22, 2021

8 min read

Introduction

In a talk by Alex Russell titled, "The Mobile Web: MIA", Alex discussed a number of issues facing the expansion of the web platform on mobile devices. He noted that, "People don't use the web the way they lean on it, and rely on it, and come to depend on it on desktop." In his talk, he noted that people use the web about 4% of the time they are using phones, and dropping. The rest of the time, users are typically interacting with mobile apps, rather than the browser.

Much of this is driven by the fact that companies that own the platforms (Google and Apple, in particular) are primarily focused on native app developments. This focus on mobile app development pushes the market to accept the importance of a mobile app, and drive users to leave the web for a native experience. Mobile app development locks experiences to devices and operating systems, which increases the cost of development. Users, in turn, grow to expect mobile applications, even for simple tasks such as viewing bus routes or filling out a form.

As web developers, we know there is another option for app development. Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are built with standard web technologies - HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and modern browser APIs - to provide an enhanced experience when using them on supported platforms. By utilizing the latest browser features, web developers can construct the same experiences users expect of native applications. These features include: accessing the camera, notifications, Bluetooth and network information- even augmented/virtual reality and payments. Browsers have been working to support these features for years, and some companies (such as Twitter) have been building PWAs to provide an improved experience for their platforms.

Let's say that we have a company, BetterX, which is looking to build a new app for their users. The primary goal is to provide an excellent experience for mobile users, including offline support and hardware features such as notifications and payments. We will explore and compare the benefits of native mobile applications and PWAs, and discuss why each platform may be the better choice.

Progressive Web Apps - The Open Web

One of the key benefits when considering a progressive web app is that we are utilizing modern web development tools to build our application. As web developers, we are already familiar with a number of complex tasks, such as state management, caching, and performance optimization. To build a PWA, we need to take these concepts to their natural conclusions. By utilizing a service worker to cache assets and IndexedDB or other methods to store local data, we can build a system that is capable of working fully offline. By using network detection, our application can determine whether an internet connection is available, and provide that information to the user.

Another benefit of building with web technologies is that we have a better chance of achieving the goal of, "write once, run anywhere". By utilizing standard architecture patterns in our application, and relying on progressive enhancement as the browser/platform we are running on allows, our PWA can run on both mobile devices (as an installed app) or on browsers. Most developers are already familiar with responsive design, which allows a website to change its appearance depending on the viewport or device. The same concepts can be applied to a PWA, incrementing our functionality as the device allows it, and providing a fallback for when certain features are not available.

Web development also has the benefit of traditionally being cheaper than mobile app development. Smaller companies don't always have the time or money to invest in a mobile development team. Most of them, however, do have a website. By utilizing some of the APIs available to progressive web applications, these shops and companies can provide a mobile experience. Also, if a website/web app is built with mobile devices in mind, the time it takes to build a fully functional PWA could be weeks, compared to a brand new mobile application taking months.

PWAs can also be significantly smaller than their native alternatives. In a report by Google, the Twitter PWA "requires less than 3% of the device storage space compared to Twitter for Android". As fewer mobile devices have ports for expanded storage space, the size of applications becomes increasingly more important.

Drawbacks

However, there are some drawbacks to choosing a progressive web app. Users expect to find mobile applications in the app store, not on a website. In his talk, Alex Russell shares a screen of an Android device with a Google search bar at the time, and a row of icons at the bottom, including the Google Play Store. He explains that people click on the search bar when they are looking for "answers", and click on the store when they are looking for "experiences". For PWAs, the way to install them is to visit the URL, and click on the install button when prompted. This is not how users have been trained to find apps for their smartphones.

It's also not clear to a user what installing a PWA achieves. On an Android device where a user installs a PWA, an icon for that app appears on their desktop as any other app would. However, depending on the app, this could be a complete experience, including offline support, or it could simply be a wrapper to load a website. In many cases, a PWA is little more than an enhanced bookmark on a mobile phone.

Mobile Applications - Platform Builders

Mobile apps are the standard established by Google and Apple for delivering user experiences on phones and tablets. Apps are an expected feature of any new platform - it's rare to see a new service thrive without a presence in the Google Play Store, or Apple App Store. Keystone applications, like Facebook or Twitter, are regularly highlighted by these platforms as a way to bring new users into their walled gardens.

Users are trained to search for, and install, mobile applications. Often, websites will guide users directly to the respective app store. On iPhones and iPads, the app store is the only way for apps to be installed on a phone, making the store even more crucial to a product's success on the platform. Since Apple does not support PWAs in Safari, this makes mobile development a requirement to reach customers within their ecosystems.

Mobile development has first-class support from both Apple and Google, providing access to APIs and features as new hardware is released. Apps being developed for newer devices can do more, and utilize more resources than ever before. Resource-intensive apps like Adobe Photoshop or Procreate can leverage these resources to achieve results previously held only on desktops and laptops.

Modern mobile development frameworks, such as Flutter and React Native, allow developers to target these devices in a cross-platform way. They provide access to the APIs and features of the hardware, and a streamlined way to write a majority of your app once, while targeting multiple platforms. Other frameworks such as Cordova or Capacitor even allow for using modern web technologies, and having a fully bundled app that can be released on the app store.

Downsides

Mobile development provides amazing functionality and allows for powerful applications to be built. However, it comes at a cost. These applications can only run on the latest and greatest hardware and OS version. Most mobile users do not have access to the hardware we, as developers, are using to build our applications. What takes a few seconds to load on 5G using an iPhone 12 Max could take nearly a minute to load on phones common in most of the world. Also, final application sizes are going to impact how many users can actually download our app in the first place.

In many cases, a mobile application in the app store could become more of a burden than a benefit. Consider that you're visiting a foreign country. Because you are roaming, your internet speed is significantly slower than you are used to. While traveling in a city, you want to check for bus routes and schedules. You go to the website for the municipal bus system, and are directed to download an app to view schedules. This app is not too large (my local bus system's app is 8.6 MB), but on your slower connection still takes a long time to download. Also, you may only need this app once or twice, before you travel to your next destination. A website (or PWA) would provide a much smoother experience than requiring a mobile app be downloaded.

Considerations

Regardless of which architecture you decide to use for building out your mobile application, there are some considerations to keep in mind. First, your developers are going to have better hardware and internet connection than many of your users. Most users do not have a high-end iPhone or Android device, and are not on 5G or gigabit internet. Whether you're building a PWA or a native app, remember that every megabyte will take substantially longer to download and initialize, and your application will run slower. If able, you should test your applications on slower or ittermitant internet speeds, or on lower end hardware.

In general, if you are going to build a mobile application, it has to be lean, loadable, and support offline use. Many companies, (and some end users), will try to push for new features or content without regard for the experience of all users. Setting up a truly performant and offline-friendly experience is complicated, but it truly is worth taking into account all potential users as you work to build and deploy it.

If you decide that building a progressive web app is the way to go for your app or company, it is important to remember that PWAs are not supported in Safari or on iOS/iPadOS. On both iPhones and iPads, the only browser engine is WebKit, regardless of which browser you are using. This means that users will not be able to install your PWA on Apple mobile devices, and the browser APIs may not be available. Take this into account while building your app, and allow for graceful degredation when features are not available. This is not to say that you shouldn't build a PWA if you want to target Apple's ecosystem - much the opposite! The more PWAs that exist, and have a large number of users on Apple's devices, the better chance that Apple will support the standardized browser features that enable PWAs.

At the end of the day, choose the architecture that best supports your users, and build with them in mind. Your app should help your users and customers in some way, and should not be a burden to them. It may be fun to try out a new mobile framework, or build a PWA with enhanced features, but not if it does not serve the end user.

This Dot is a consultancy dedicated to guiding companies through their modernization and digital transformation journeys. Specializing in replatforming, modernizing, and launching new initiatives, we stand out by taking true ownership of your engineering projects.

We love helping teams with projects that have missed their deadlines or helping keep your strategic digital initiatives on course. Check out our case studies and our clients that trust us with their engineering.

Lindsay Wardell

Lindsay is a software engineer at This Dot Labs, and a host on the podcast Views on Vue. She loves learning about new languages and tools, and sharing that knowledge with the community.

@lindsaykwardell @lindsaykwardell

Demystifying React Server Components

React Server Components (RSCs) are the latest addition to the React ecosystem, and they've caused a bit of a disruption to how we think about React. Dan Abramov recently wrote an article titled "The Two Reacts" that explores the paradigms of client component and server component mental models and leaves us with the thought on how we can cohesively combine these concepts in a meaningful way. It took me a while to finally give RSCs the proper exploration to truly understand the "new" model and grasp where React is heading. First off, the new model isn't really new so much as it introduces a few new concepts for us to consider when architecting our applications. Once I understood the pattern, I found an appreciation for the model and what it's trying to help us accomplish. In this post, I hope I can show you the progression of the React architecture in applications as I've experienced them and how I think RSCs help us improve this model and our apps. A "Brief" History of React Rendering and Data-Fetching Patterns One of the biggest challenges in React since its early days is "how do we server render pages?" Server-side rendering (SSR) is one of the techniques we can use to ensure users see data on initial load and helps with our site's SEO. Without SSR, users would see blank screens or loading spinners, and then a bunch of content would appear shortly after. An excellent graphic on Remix's website demonstrates this behavior from the end user's perspective and it's a problem we generally try to avoid as developers. This problem is so vast and difficult that we've been trying to solve it since 2015. Rick Hanlon from the React Core Team reminded us just how complicated this problem was recently. If you think react is complicated now, go back to 2015 when you had to configure babel and webpack yourself, you had to do SSR and routing yourself, you had to decide between flow and typescript, you had to learn flux and immutable.js, and you had to choose 1 of 100 boilerplates— Ricky (@rickhanlonii) January 28, 2024 But SSR has its issues too. Sometimes SSR is slow because we need to do a lot of data fetching for our page. Because of these large payloads, we'll defer their rendering using lazy loading patterns. All of a sudden we have spinners again! How we've managed these components has changed too. Over the years, we've seen a variety of patterns emerge for managing these problems. We had server-side pre-fetching where we had to hydrate our frontends application state. Then we tried controller-view patterned components for our lazily loaded client-side components. With the evolution of React, we were able to simplify the controller-view patterns to leverage hooks. Now, we're in a new era of multi-server entry points on a page with RSCs. The Benefits of React Server Components RSCs give us this new paradigm that allows us to have multiple entries into our server on a single page. Leveraging features like Next.js' streaming mode and caching, we can limit what our pages block on for SSR and optimize their performance. To illustrate this, let's look at this small block of PHP for something we might have done in the 2000s: index.php ` For simplicity, the blocks indicate server boundaries where we can execute PHP functionality. Once we exit that block, we can no longer leverage or communicate with the server. In this example, we're displaying a welcome message to a user and a list of posts. If we look at Next.js' page router leveraging getServerSideProps, we would maybe write this same page as follows: pages/posts.jsx ` In this case, we're having our server do a lot to fetch the data we need to render this page and all its components. This also makes the line between server and client much clearer as getServerSideProps runs before our client renders, and we're unable to go back to that function without an API route and client-side fetch. Now, let's look at Next.js' app router with server components. This same component could be rendered as follows: app/posts/page.tsx ` This moves us a bit closer back to our PHP version as we don't have to split our server and client functionality as explicitly. This example is relatively simple and only renders a few components that could be easily rendered as static content. This page also probably requires all the content to be rendered upfront. But, from this, we can see that we're able to simplify how server data fetching is done. If nothing else, we could use this pattern to make our SSR patterns better and client render the rest of our apps, but then we'd lose out on some of the additional benefits that we can get when we combine this with streaming. Let's look at a post page that probably has the content and a comments section. We don't need to render the comments immediately on page load or block on it because it's a secondary feature on the page. This is where we can pull in Suspense and make our page shine. Our code might look as follows: app/posts/[slug]/page.jsx ` Our PostComments are a server component that renders static content again, but we don't want its render to block our page from being served to the client. What we've done here is moved the fetch operation into the comments component and wrapped it in a Suspense boundary in our page to defer its render until its content has been fetched and then stream it onto the page into its render location. We could also add a fallback to our suspense boundary if we wanted to put a skeleton loader or other indication UI. With these changes, we're writing components similarly to how we've written them on the client historically but simplified our data fetch. What happens when we start to progressively enhance our features with client-side JavaScript? Client Components with RSCs All our examples focused on staying in the server context which is great for simple applications, but what happens when we want to add interactivity? If you were to put a useState, useEffect, onClick, or other client-side React feature into a server component, you'd find some error messages because you can't run client code from a server context. If we think back to our PHP example, that makes a lot of sense why this is the case, but how do we work around this? For me, this is where my first really mental challenge with RSCs started. Let's use our PostComments as an example to enhance by in-place sorting the section from the server. ` In this example, we're using a server component the same way as our previous example to do the initial data fetch and stream when ready. However, we're immediately passing the results to a client component that renders the elements and enhances our code with a list of sort options. When we select the sort we want, our code makes a request to the server at a predefined route and gets the new data that we re-render in the new order on screen. This is how we might have done things without RSCs before but without a useEffect for our initial rendering. If you're familiar with the old controller-view pattern, this is relatively similar to that pattern, but we have to relegate client re-fetching to the view (client) component, where we might have had all fetch and re-fetch patterns in the controller (server) component Another way to solve this same problem is leveraging server actions, but that would cause the page to re-render. Given the caching mechanisms in Next.js, this is probably fine, but it's not the user experience people are expecting. Server actions are a topic of their own, so I won't cover them in this post, but they're important for the holistic ecosystem experience in the new mindset. Interleaving Nested Server & Client Components These examples have shown a clean approach where we keep our server components at the top of our rendering tree and have a clear line where we move from server mode to client mode. But one of the advantages of RSCs is that we can interleave where our server component entry points may exist. Let's think about a product carousel on a storefront page for example. We may have built this as follows before: ` Here we're rendering carousels that render their cards and our tree goes server -> client -> server. This is not allowed in the new paradigm because the React compiler cannot detect that we moved back into a server component when we called ProductCards from a client component. Instead, we would need to refactor this to be: ` Here, we've changed ProductCarousel to accept children that are our ProductCards server component. This allows the compiler to detect the boundary and render it appropriately. I'd also recommend adding Suspense boundaries to these carousels but I omitted it for the sake of brevity in this example. Some Suggested Best Practices Our team has been using these new patterns for some time and have developed some patterns we've identified as best practices for us to help keep some of these boundaries clear that I thought worth sharing. 1. Be explicit with component types We've found that being explicit with component types is essential to expressing intent. Some components are strictly server, some are strictly client, and others can be used in both contexts. Our team likes using the server-only package to express this intent but we found we needed more. We've opted for the following naming conventions: Server only components: component-name.server.(jsx|tsx) Client only components: component-name.client.(jsx|tsx) Universal components: component-name.(jsx|tsx) This does not apply to special framework file names but we've found this helps us delineate where we are and to help with interleaving. 2. Defer Fetch when Cache is Available If we're trying to render a component that is a collection of other components, we've found deferring the fetch to the child allows our cache to do more for us in rendering in cases where the same element may exist in different locations. This is similar to how GraphQL's data loaders works and can ideally boost the performance of cached server components. So, in our product example above, we may only fetch the IDs of the products we need for the ProductCards and then fetch all the data per card. Yes, this is an extra fetch and causes an N+1, but if our cache is in play, end users will feel a performance gain. 3. Colocate loaders and queries If you're using GraphQL or need loading states for components for Suspense fallback, we recommend colocating those elements in the same file or directory. This makes it easier to modify and manage related elements for your components in a more meaningful way. 4. Use Suspense to defer non-essential content This will depend on your website and needs. Still, we recommend deferring as many non-essential elements to Suspense as possible. We define non-essential to be anything you could consider secondary to the page. On a blog post, this could be recommended posts or comments. On a product page, this could be reviews and related products. So long as the primary focus of your page is outside a Suspense boundary, your usage is probably acceptable. Conclusion RSCs represent a significant evolution in the React ecosystem, offering new paradigms and opportunities for improving the architecture of web applications. They enable multiple server entry points on a single page, optimizing server-side rendering, and simplifying data fetching. RSCs allow for a clearer separation between server and client functionality, enhancing both performance and maintainability. To make the most of RSCs, developers should consider best practices such as being explicit with component types, deferring fetch when caching is available, colocating loaders and queries, and using Suspense to defer non-essential content. Embracing these practices can help harness the potential of React Server Components and pave the way for more efficient and interactive web applications. We're excited about this development in the React ecosystem and the developments happening across teams and frameworks that are opting into using them. While Next.js offers a great solution, we're excited to see similar enhancements to Remix and RedwoodJS....

Feb 2, 2024

9 mins

ReactNextJSArchitecture

How to Implement an Event Bus in TypeScript

In real-world software development, design patterns offer reusable solutions and, most prominently, make code easier to maintain. The Event Bus idea is generally associated with the Publish-subscribe pattern: > Publish–subscribe is a messaging pattern through which message senders, called "publishers", do not program the messages to be sent directly to specific receivers, called "subscribers". Instead, they classify published messages without knowledge of which subscribers sent them. In other words, an Event Bus can be considered as a global way to transport messages or events to make them accessible from any place within the application. In this blog post, we'll use TypeScript to implement a general-purpose Event Bus for JavaScript applications. Inspiration The concept of an Event Bus comes from the Bus Topology or _Bus Network_, in which nodes are directly connected to a common half-duplex link called a "bus". Every station will receive all network traffic as seen in the image below. In a software context, you can assume an object instead of a computer. Then, a message can be triggered from any object through the Bus, and it can be sent using an event, even including some data. Let's move forward with a TypeScript implementation of this pattern. Project Setup Prerequisites You'll need to have installed the following tools in your local environment: * Node.js. Preferably the latest LTS version. * A package manager. You can use either NPM or Yarn. This tutorial will use NPM. Initialize the Project Let's create the project from scratch. First, create a new folder using event-bus-typescript as the name: ` Next, let's initialize the project using NPM, and basic TypeScript configurations: ` Update the scripts section from the package.json file: ` Proceed to update the tsconfig.json file with the configurations listed below. ` Finally, create the src folder to contain the source code files. Project Structure The previous project already contains the main configurations ready to go with TypeScript. Open it in your favorite code editor, and make sure to have the following project structure: ` Event Bus Implementation For the Event Bus implementation, let's create a src/event-bus/event-bus.ts file. Creating the Model To ensure robust typing within the TypeScript context, let's make sure to define a couple of _Interfaces_ for the data model. ` Pay attention to the IEventBus interface, which represents a contract for the future Event Bus class implementation. ` Pay attention to the public methods: * The dispatch function makes use of the TypeScript generics to enable capturing the right type of parameters at the moment the method gets called. An example of its use will be provided at the end of this article. * The register function receives an event name and a _callback_ function to be invoked. In the end, it returns a Registry object to enable a way of _unregistering_ the same event. The Singleton Pattern Since the Event Bus can be accessed from any place in the application, it's important to have a unique instance. Then, you can implement the Singleton Pattern in the existing class as follows. ` Here are the main points of this Singleton class: * A static instance is defined to have the unique reference of an object of this class. * The constructor method is private, since creating an object from any place is not allowed. * The getInstance() method makes sure to instantiate an object of this class only once. Using the Event Bus In order to explain the use of the brand-new Event Bus, we'll need to create a src/main.ts file. ` Once you run npm run start command, you should see the following output: ` However, we can have full control of the initial subscription too: ` Let's explain what's happening now: * The first line performs a call to the _register_ method from the Event Bus instance. * Then, a reference of the Registry object is available through the registry variable. * Later, it's possible to perform the registry.unregister() call to avoid dispatching the last "hello world" call. Here's the output result of those operations: ` Live Demo Wanna play around with this code? Just open the embedded Stackblitz editor: Source Code of the Project Find the complete project in this GitHub repository: event-bus-typescript. Do not forget to give it a star ⭐️ and play around with the code. Feel free to reach out on Twitter if you have any questions. Follow me on GitHub to see more about my work. Be ready for more articles about Lit in this blog....

Jul 16, 2021

4 mins

Web DevelopmentArchitectureTypeScript

Building Web Components with Vue 3.2

Introduction Have you ever worked across multiple projects, and wanted a set of custom components you could just leverage across all of them? Whether for a job or just for side projects, having a suite of components you can reach for is an excellent way to get going faster in a new or existing project. But what if not all of your projects are using the same UI framework? Or, what if you have one that isn't using any JavaScript framework at all, and is completely server-rendered? As a Vue developer, ideally we would like to just use our framework of choice to build complex user interfaces. But sometimes we find ourselves in the above situation, working with another JavaScript framework such as React or Angular, or using a backend rendering system like Rails or Laravel. How can we build a reusable UI across these various frontend options? In Vue 3.2, we now have a solution to this problem: Web Components, powered by Vue! Web Components According to MDN, "Web Components is a suite of different technologies allowing you to create reusable custom elements — with their functionality encapsulated away from the rest of your code — and utilize them in your web apps." Consider a few existing elements in HTML, such as select or video. These interactive elements contain their own basic styling (typically provided by the browser), some internal logic, and a way to listen to events. Web Components allow developers to build their own elements, and reference them in their HTML - no framework required. Here's a very basic web component example of a component that would display the current time. ` Once a custom Web Component has been defined, they can be rendered as part of the DOM, just like any standard HTML element. We can use this element in our HTML like this: ` We can also use custom attributes with these elements, allowing us to pass data into them (similar to props in Vue). Note that objects cannot be passed in as attributes, because that is a JavaScript concept, not an HTML feature. ` While we could write this logic pretty easily in a script tag using vanilla JavaScript, utilizing Web Components gives us the ability to encapsulate specific logic and functionality within the component, thus keeping our code more organized and understandable. This is the same reason we utilize component frameworks like Vue and React. Also, as we discussed earlier, Web Components are flexible in that they can be used without a JS framework, but are also compatible with modern frameworks (React and Vue both other support for using Web Components). Vue-Powered Web Components Vue 3.2 includes built-in support for defining custom Web Components while utilzing the Vue API. In this way, we get the best of both worlds - custom, reusable components across frameworks/interfaces, plus the excellent API of Vue. Let's take our example of getting the current time, and translate that into a Vue component. We will be using , which is the recommended way to write Vue single-file components today. To start, let's create our new file, CurrentTime.ce.vue (ce in this case stands for custom element). ` Great, our component is doing exactly what we were doing before. Next, we need to import this into our main Javascript somewhere, and define it as a custom element. ` What did we do here? 1. First, we import Vue's defineCustomElement function, which converts a Vue component into a custom element. 2. We then import our Vue SFC, and pass it into defineCustomElement, generating the constructor required for the web components APIs. 3. Then, we define the custom element in the DOM, supplying it with the tag that we want to use (current-time) and the constructor it should use to render. With that, our Vue web component can now be rendered in our app! And since web components work in all modern frameworks (as well as non-JS frameworks like Ruby on Rails or Laravel), we can now build out a suite of web components for our application using Vue, and then utlize them in any frontend we want. Here's a basic example using vanilla JS, and the default Vite template: ` You can see a working example of this on Stackblitz. More Features Creating a basic Vue component isn't always what you want to do, though. What happens if we need to utilize props or events? Fortunately, Vue has us covered here as well. Let's explore some of the basic functions we'd expect from our custom Vue components. Props The first thing we want to do is pass in props to our web component. Using our component, we want to be able to set the time zone. For this case, we can use props as we normally would for an HTML element. In our HTML template, let's change our code to the following: ` If you save your file now, you will probably get an error in your console like this one: ` This is because our prop isn't defined in the component yet. Let's take care of that now. Go back to your Vue component, and make the following changes: ` In our Vue component, we are now defining props (using Vue 3.2's defineProps helper, which we do not need to import), then using the timeZone prop to translate the date into the correct time zone string. Nice! Save your files, and our app should work again as expected, but this time, it will display the date in a different time zone. Feel free to play around with it a bit, trying out some different time zones. By default, Vue will translate props into their defined types. Since HTML only allows strings to be passed in as attributes, Vue is handling the translation to different types for us. Events From the docs: "Events emitted via this.$emit or setup emit are dispatched as native CustomEvents on the custom element. Additional event arguments (payload) will be exposed as an array on the CustomEvent object as its details property." Let's add a basic emit from our component that will trigger a console.log. In our Vue component, update our script block to the following: ` The main change we're making here is to add defineEmits (also available without import, similar to defineProps) in order to define what events this component makes. We then begin to use this in our setInterval step, to emit the new date as an event. In our main.js, we'll now add the event listener to our web component. ` With this, whenever the first component emits a datechange event, we will be able to listen for it, and act accordingly. Nice! Slots Slots are used exactly as expected within Vue, including named slots. Scoped slots, as they are an advanced feature within a full Vue application, are not supported. Also, when utilizing named slots in your application, you will need to use the native slot syntax, rather than Vue's specific slot syntax. Let's give this a try now. In you Vue component, change your template to the following: ` For this example, we are using a standard slot (we'll get back to named slots later). Now, in your HTML, add some text in between the tags: ` If you save and reload your page, you should now see that your text (or whatever content you want) is correctly passing into your web component. Now, let's do the same thing using named slots. Change your Vue component to have a named slot (`, for example), and your HTML like this: ` The result should be the same! And now we can use named slots in our web components. Styles One of the great parts about web components is that they can utilize a shadow root, an encapsulated portion of the DOM that contains their own styling information. This feature is available to our Vue web components as well. When you name your file with the .ce.vue extension, it defaults to having inline styles. This is perfect if you want to use your components as a library in an application. Provide/Inject Provide and inject also work as expected within Vue web components. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that they only can pass data to other Vue web components. From the docs, "a Vue-defined custom element won't be able to inject properties provided by a non-custom-element Vue component." Conclusion Vue 3.2 provides the ability to write custom web components using Vue's familiar syntax, and the flexibility of the Composition API. Keep in mind, however, that this is not the recommended approach to writing Vue applications, or application development in general. The documentation goes to great lengths to explain the differences between web components and Vue-specific components, and why the Vue team feels their approach is preferable for web development. However, web components are still an amazing technology for building cross-framework applications. Plenty of tools exist in the web development ecosystem focused purely on web components, such as Lit or Ionic. While this may not be the recommended approach to building applications with Vue, it can provide an encapsulated way to get certain features developed and functional across teams or projects. Regardless of your stance on web components, I highly encourage you to check out this new feature of Vue and experiment with it yourself. You could even try mounting your component in React or Svelte, and see how easy it is to work with across JavaScript frameworks. Most important of all, remember that the development ecosystem is always improving and growing, and it's up to you to be ready to grow with it. StackBlitz Demo Play around with the StackBlitz demo below and here's an example of a Vue web component I am utilizing in a side project I'm working on. Have fun!...

Oct 5, 2021

7 mins

VueJavaScriptWeb Development

How to Make Coding Both Your Hobby and Profession with Jason Lengsdorf @ CityJS Conf 2024

Join us backstage at CityJS Conf for this conversation with Jason Lengsdorf. In this discussion, we explore strategies for reducing stress and anxiety among engineers, ensuring they maintain relevance in the dynamic world of coding. Jason emphasizes the importance of self-assurance and the role of play in fostering continual engagement with evolving technologies. Moreover, we get a sneak peek into Jason's latest venture, "Web Lunch," a platform where he converses with developers who have found harmony between their careers and personal satisfaction. Coding isn't just a job; it's a passion and a lifestyle. Jason highlights the significance of pursuing work that excites and challenges us, echoing the sentiment that coding can be both a career and a hobby. By infusing enjoyment and creativity into our coding endeavors, we can shape our professional trajectories in alignment with our values and interests. This approach not only minimizes regret but also maximizes happiness and fulfillment in our careers. Central to our discussion is the pivotal role of effective leadership in creating a supportive and encouraging work environment. Leaders who prioritize the well-being and happiness of their team members foster a culture of collaboration and empowerment. Through mentorship, guidance, and opportunities for growth, these leaders enable developers to align their personal goals with organizational objectives, leading to increased job satisfaction and professional fulfillment. Adaptability is key to sustained success in software engineering. Jason emphasizes the value of remaining open-minded and continuously learning, even when it means stepping out of our comfort zones. Embracing discomfort is an integral part of personal growth, allowing us to overcome obstacles and unlock our full potential. By nurturing a spirit of curiosity and adaptability, developers can navigate the complexities of their careers with resilience and enthusiasm....

Apr 25, 2024

2 mins

JavaScriptMentorship

Progressive Web Apps and Mobile Apps

Introduction

Progressive Web Apps - The Open Web

Drawbacks

Mobile Applications - Platform Builders

Downsides

Considerations

Lindsay Wardell

You might also like

Demystifying React Server Components

How to Implement an Event Bus in TypeScript

Building Web Components with Vue 3.2

How to Make Coding Both Your Hobby and Profession with Jason Lengsdorf @ CityJS Conf 2024

You might also like

Demystifying React Server Components

How to Implement an Event Bus in TypeScript

Building Web Components with Vue 3.2

How to Make Coding Both Your Hobby and Profession with Jason Lengsdorf @ CityJS Conf 2024