Skip to content

How to Apply a Gradient Effect to Text with CSS

This article was written over 18 months ago and may contain information that is out of date. Some content may be relevant but please refer to the relevant official documentation or available resources for the latest information.

I will be taking us through some ways we can add gradient effect to text. This tutorial also assumes that you have an understanding of CSS and its properties like background, and background-color.

Creating Gradient Effects

Before we start creating gradient effect, let's understand a few concepts.

What is gradient?

Gradients let you display smooth transitions between two or more specified colors.

You can read more about Gradient here.

Linear Gradient

Perhaps the most common and useful type of gradient is the linear-gradient(). The gradients “axis” can go from left-to-right, top-to-bottom, or at any angle you chose.

Below, you will find a code example.

You can read more about Linear Gradient.

Radial Gradient

Radial gradients differ from linear ones in that they start at a single point and emanate outwards. Gradients are often used to simulate a lighting, which as we know isn’t always straight. So they can be useful to make a gradient seem even more natural.

Below you will find a code example: You can read more about Radial Gradient.

Code

We will be exploring various ways we can add gradients to text, but lets look at the CSS properties that can help us achieve this.

  • background
  • -webkit-background-clip
  • -webkit-text-fill-color

Background

The CSS background properties are used to add background effects for elements. More on CSS background.

-webkit-background-clip

The background-clip property defines how far the background (color or image) should extend within an element. More on CSS background clip.

-webkit-text-fill-color

The text-fill-color property specifies the fill color of characters of the text. If this property is not specified, the value of the color property is used. The text-fill-color and the color properties are the same, but the text-fill-color takes precedence over the color if the two have different values. More on CSS Text fill color.

Full Gradient

What we mean here is applying gradient effect on the entire text. In our code sample we used both radial and linear gradient.




Partial Gradient

What we mean here is applying gradient effect to some part of the text. In our code sample, we used both radial and linear gradient.

There are various ways to go about this depending on what you wish to achieve.



First Concept

This concept involves us first applying the gradient to the entire text, then targeting the part on the text we dont wnat the gradient to affect by wrapping that part of the text with any tag of your choice. But in our case, we used span tag.


.partial-linear-one {
  background: linear-gradient(90deg, #b2ff42 0%, #0d8773 100%);
  -webkit-background-clip: text;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent;
}

.partial-one > span {
  background: #FFFFFF;
  -webkit-background-clip: text;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent;
}

Second Concept

This concept involves us giving the entire text a color using the css color property, and then giving the part of the text, we want to apply the gradient effect by wrapping the part of the text with any tag of your choice. But in our case, we used span tag.


.partial-two {
  color: #FFFFFF;
}

.partial-linear-two > span {
  background: linear-gradient(90deg, #b2ff42 0%, #0d8773 100%);
  -webkit-background-clip: text;
  -webkit-text-fill-color: transparent;
}


The code snipet below shows the examples in full and can be practiced with



Source Code

If you have any issue at all, here is a link to the git repository Text gradient effect.


This Dot is a consultancy dedicated to guiding companies through their modernization and digital transformation journeys. Specializing in replatforming, modernizing, and launching new initiatives, we stand out by taking true ownership of your engineering projects.

We love helping teams with projects that have missed their deadlines or helping keep your strategic digital initiatives on course. Check out our case studies and our clients that trust us with their engineering.

You might also like

CSS Container Queries, what are they? cover image

CSS Container Queries, what are they?

CSS Container queries, what are they? Intro Media queries have always been crucial to building web applications. They help make our apps more accessible and easier to use and ensure we reach most of our audience. Media queries have been essential in frontend development to create unique user interfaces. But now, there’s something new: Container queries. In this blog post, we’ll explore what Container queries are, how they differ from media queries, and why they’re so amazing. So, let’s get started! Refresh on Media queries Media queries have been available in browsers for a long time, but they didn’t become popular until around 2010 when mobile devices started to take off. Media queries let us add specific styles based on the type of device, like screens or printers. This is especially helpful for creating modern, responsive apps. A simple use of Media queries would be changing, for example, a paragraph's font size when the screen width is less than a specific number. ` In this simple example, when the browser’s viewport width is less or equal to 400px, the font size changes to 8px. Notice how straightforward the syntax is: we start with the keyword @media, followed by the type of device it should apply to. In this case, we use screen so it doesn’t affect users who print the page—if you don’t add anything, then it falls back to the default, which is “all” including both print and screen. Then we specify a media feature, in this case, the width. Container queries Container queries are similar to Media queries. Their main function is to apply styles under certain conditions. The difference is that instead of listening to the viewport of the browser, it listens to a container size. Let’s see this example: In the above layout, we have a layout with a sidebar and three cards as the content. Using Media queries we could listen to the viewport width and change the layout depending on a specific width. Like so: ` That’s acceptable, but it requires us to constantly monitor the layout. For example, if we added another sidebar on the right (really weird, but let’s imagine that this is a typical case), our layout would become more condensed: We would need to change our media queries and adjust their range in this situation. Wouldn’t it be better to check the card container’s width and update its styles based on that? That way, we wouldn’t need to worry about if the layout changes, and that’s precisely what container queries are made for! First, to define the container we are going to listen to, we are going to add a new property to our styles: ` The .container class is the one in which our cards reside. By adding the property `container-type, ' we now define this class as a container we want to listen to. We said inline-size as the value to query based on the inline dimensions of the container because we just want to listen to the element's width. The value of container-type will depend on your use case. If you want to listen to both width and height, then size will be a better fit for you. You can also have normal as your container-type value, which means the element won’t act as a query container at all. This is handy if you need to revert to the default behavior. Next, to define our query, we use the new @container CSS at-rule: ` Notice that it is really similar to how we define our Media queries. Now, if we look at the same screen, we will see the following: This is very powerful because we can now style each component with its own rules without changing the rules based on the layout changes. The @container will affect all the defined containers in the scope; we might not want that. We can define the name of our container to specify that we only want to listen to that in specific: ` We can also have a shorthand to define our container and its name: ` Container query length units Container query lengths are similar to the viewport-percentage length units like vh or vw units, but instead of being relative to the viewport, they are to the dimensions of the query container. We have different units, each relative to different dimensions of the container: - cqw: 1% of a query container's width - cqh: 1% of a query container's height - cqi: 1% of a query container's inline size - cqb: 1% of a query container's block size - cqmin: The smaller value of either cqi or cqb - cqmax: The larger value of either cqi or cqb In our example, we could use them to define the font size of our cards: ` Using these units alone isn’t recommended because they’re percentage-based and can have a value we don’t want. Instead, it’s better to use a dynamic range. Using the max function, we can set 2 values and always pick the highest one. Conclusion Container queries bring a fresh and powerful approach to web design but are not meant to replace Media queries. I think their real power shines when used together. Media queries often require constant adjustments as your layout evolves. Container queries, however, let you style individual components based on their dimensions, making the designs more flexible and easier to manage. Adding a new component or rearranging elements won’t force us to rewrite our media queries. Instead, each component handles its styling, leading to cleaner and more organized code. Please note that, as of writing this blog post, they aren’t compatible with all browsers yet. Take a look at this table from caniuse.com: A good fallback strategy for this, when hitting an unsupported browser would be the use of the @support rule, which allows you to apply styles only if the browser supports the CSS feature. For example: ` Ensure your media queries are good enough to keep everything responsive and user-friendly when the condition is unmet. Thank you for reading! Enjoy the extra flexibility that container queries bring to your web designs. Check out a live demo to see it in action. Happy styling!...

How to Truncate Strings Easily with CSS cover image

How to Truncate Strings Easily with CSS

You'll often need to truncate text when working with user interfaces, especially when displaying content within a limited space. CSS provides a straightforward way to handle this scenario, ensuring that long text strings are cut off gracefully without affecting the overall layout. CSS Truncation Techniques Single-Line Truncation If you want to truncate a single line of text, CSS provides a simple solution. The key properties to use here are overflow, white-space, and text-overflow. ` Explanation of properties: * white-space: nowrap: This ensures the text stays on a single line, preventing wrapping. * overflow: hidden: This hides any content that overflows the container. * text-overflow: ellipsis: This adds the ellipsis (…) at the end of the truncated text. Multi-Line Truncation While truncating a single line of text is common, sometimes you may want to display multiple lines but still cut off the text when it exceeds a certain number of lines. You can use a combination of CSS properties such as -webkit-line-clamp along with the display and overflow properties. ` Live example: Explanation of properties: * display: -webkit-box: This is a legacy flexbox-like display property that works with the -webkit-line-clamp property. * -webkit-line-clamp: Specifies the number of lines to show before truncating. * -webkit-box-orient: vertical: Ensures the box is laid out vertically for proper multi-line truncation. * overflow: hidden: Prevents content overflow. * text-overflow: ellipsis: Adds an ellipsis after the truncated content. Why Use CSS for Text Truncation Over JavaScript Techniques? While it’s possible to truncate text using JavaScript, CSS is often a better choice for this task for several reasons. Let's explore why CSS-based truncation techniques are generally preferred over JavaScript. Performance Efficiency CSS operates directly within the browser's layout engine, meaning it doesn’t require additional processing or event handling as JavaScript does. When using JavaScript to truncate text, the script needs to run on page load (or after DOM manipulation), and sometimes, it needs to listen for events such as window resizing to adjust truncation. This can introduce unnecessary overhead, especially in complex or resource-constrained environments like mobile devices. CSS, on the other hand, is declarative. Once applied, it allows the browser to handle text rendering without any further execution or processing. This leads to faster load times and a smoother user experience. Simplicity and Maintainability CSS solutions are much simpler to implement and maintain than their JavaScript counterparts. All it takes is a few lines of CSS to implement truncation. In contrast, a JavaScript solution would require you to write and maintain a function that manually trims strings, inserts ellipses, and re-adjusts the text whenever the window is resized. Here's the JavaScript Truncation Example to compare the complexity: JavaScript Truncation Example: ` At the example above, we truncated the text to 50 characters which may be 1 line on large screens and 6 lines on mobile and in that case we will need to add more code to truncate it responsively. As you can see, the CSS solution we used earlier is more concise and readable, whereas the JavaScript version is more verbose and requires managing the string length manually. Responsiveness Without Extra Code With CSS, truncation can adapt automatically to different screen sizes and layouts. You can use relative units (like percentages or vw/vh), media queries, or flexbox/grid properties to ensure the text truncates appropriately in various contexts. If you were using JavaScript, you’d need to write additional logic to detect changes in the viewport size and update the truncation manually. This would likely involve adding event listeners for window resize events, which can degrade performance and lead to more complex code. CSS Example for Responsive Truncation: ` To achieve this in JavaScript, you’d need to add more code to handle the width adjustments dynamically, making it more complex to maintain and troubleshoot. Separation of Concerns CSS handles the presentation layer of your website, while JavaScript should focus on dynamic functionality or data manipulation. By keeping truncation logic within your CSS, you're adhering to the principle of separation of concerns, where each layer of your web application has a clear, well-defined role. Using JavaScript for visual tasks like truncation mixes these concerns, making your codebase harder to maintain, debug, and scale. CSS is purpose-built for layout and visual control, and truncation is naturally a part of that domain. Browser Support and Cross-Browser Consistency Modern CSS properties like text-overflow and -webkit-line-clamp are widely supported across all major browsers. This means that CSS solutions for truncation are generally consistent and reliable. JavaScript solutions, on the other hand, may behave differently depending on the browser environment and require additional testing and handling for cross-browser compatibility. While older browsers may not support specific CSS truncation techniques (e.g., multi-line truncation), fallback options (like single-line truncation) can be easily managed through CSS alone. With JavaScript, more complex logic might be required to handle such situations. Reduced Risk of Layout Shifting JavaScript-based text truncation risks causing layout shifting, especially during initial page loads or window resizes. The browser may need to recalculate the layout multiple times, leading to content flashing or jumpy behavior as text truncation is applied. CSS-based truncation is applied as part of the browser’s natural rendering flow, eliminating this risk and ensuring a smoother experience for the user. Conclusion CSS is the optimal solution for truncating text in most cases due to its simplicity, efficiency, and responsiveness. It leverages the power of the browser’s rendering engine, avoids the overhead of JavaScript, and keeps your code clean and maintainable. While JavaScript truncation has its use cases, CSS should always be your go-to solution for truncating strings, especially in static or predictable layouts. If you like this post, check out the other CSS posts on our blog!...

Mocking REST API in Unit Test Using MSW cover image

Mocking REST API in Unit Test Using MSW

Unit testing has become an integral part of application development, and in this discussion, we will be talking about mocking API while unit testing using MSW, a tool used for mocking APIs. We also won't be setting the test environment up since we expect you have already done so, and also we will be using a React project for our testing. Please note: the setup will work for any framework of your choice. What is MSW? MSW (Mock Service Worker) is an API mocking library that uses Service Worker API to intercept actual requests. Why Mock? Well, it avoids us making an actual HTTP request by leveraging on mock server, and a service worker which, in turn, prevents any form of break should something go wrong with the server you would have sent a request to. What is a Mock Server? A mock server imitates a real API server by returning the mock API responses to the API requests. This will help intercept the API request. You can read more here. Project Setup We will be installing few packges, and doing a little configuration. Installations We will be installing the following - msw: This package helps use to mock the API request and also helps us set up the server. - whatwg-fetch: Not always required, but what it does is it makes fetch available if you are useing the fetch API. Sometimes you get this: ` Creating the mock config Lets create a mock folder in our src folder to keep things organized. We want to have two files in the mock folder in this example: - postHandler.js: Here, we will have the handler that will help with intercepting the API. - serverSetup.js: Here we will set up or server that will house the handler. postHandler.js content Its important that the API url matches the url you intend to intercept: ` Lets explain the above code: posts: This is dummy data that is going to serve as our response data knowing full well what the data structure might look like. postHandler: This will serve as the handler, which will help in intercepting the request made to that url. serverSetUp.js content ` From the above code, the setupServer can take in any number of handlers separated by comma. The setupServer serves as our "fake" server where we can add as many handlers to intercept requests. Component Lets create a component for the purpose of our test. Here, I will be making use of the App.js file. My code will look like this: ` All we are doing is fetching some data from the URL when the component mounts and saving the data in our state to display them. And we are using the jsonplacehoder url to fetch posts. Test the component We will create a test file named App.spec.js with this contents ` We imported the component we want to test with: the whatwg-fetch to prevent us with the possible error we talked about. Then, we imported our server. There are few methods above: - beforeAll: This runs before all tests are executed. - afterAll: The opposite of beforeAll. - afterEach: As the name implies, it runs after each test. - resetHandler: It is a useful clean up mechanism between multiple test suites that leverage runtime request handlers. If you added another handler during a test, this resetHandler will remove that handler so that the next test will not know about it. You can see an example of reset handler. Though, in our code example, we didn't need it. But its important to know we have such control and power over what we want to do. So, in summary before all listen to the server for any request, after all close the server and after each test reset handler. On app render there is an API call, but our server will intercept it, so at first the loading text will exist. Then after, it won't. Will it work without intercepting? Yes it will. So, why do all of this? - Anything could happen to the API server, so you don't want you app test to fail. - The data could change, and we don't want a situation where the test fails because of data changes. Conclusion We have created a repo that you can test with in case you have issues following along. Please feel free to let us know what you think as we look forward to building a stronger community by sharing knowledge....

Next.js Rendering Strategies and how they affect core web vitals cover image

Next.js Rendering Strategies and how they affect core web vitals

When it comes to building fast and scalable web apps with Next.js, it’s important to understand how rendering works, especially with the App Router. Next.js organizes rendering around two main environments: the server and the client. On the server side, you’ll encounter three key strategies: Static Rendering, Dynamic Rendering, and Streaming. Each one comes with its own set of trade-offs and performance benefits, so knowing when to use which is crucial for delivering a great user experience. In this post, we'll break down each strategy, what it's good for, and how it impacts your site's performance, especially Core Web Vitals. We'll also explore hybrid approaches and provide practical guidance on choosing the right strategy for your use case. What Are Core Web Vitals? Core Web Vitals are a set of metrics defined by Google that measure real-world user experience on websites. These metrics play a major role in search engine rankings and directly affect how users perceive the speed and smoothness of your site. * Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): This measures loading performance. It calculates the time taken for the largest visible content element to render. A good LCP is 2.5 seconds or less. * Interaction to Next Paint (INP): This measures responsiveness to user input. A good INP is 200 milliseconds or less. * Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): This measures the visual stability of the page. It quantifies layout instability during load. A good CLS is 0.1 or less. If you want to dive deeper into Core Web Vitals and understand more about their impact on your website's performance, I recommend reading this detailed guide on New Core Web Vitals and How They Work. Next.js Rendering Strategies and Core Web Vitals Let's explore each rendering strategy in detail: 1. Static Rendering (Server Rendering Strategy) Static Rendering is the default for Server Components in Next.js. With this approach, components are rendered at build time (or during revalidation), and the resulting HTML is reused for each request. This pre-rendering happens on the server, not in the user's browser. Static rendering is ideal for routes where the data is not personalized to the user, and this makes it suitable for: * Content-focused websites: Blogs, documentation, marketing pages * E-commerce product listings: When product details don't change frequently * SEO-critical pages: When search engine visibility is a priority * High-traffic pages: When you want to minimize server load How Static Rendering Affects Core Web Vitals * Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Static rendering typically leads to excellent LCP scores (typically < 1s). The Pre-rendered HTML can be cached and delivered instantly from CDNs, resulting in very fast delivery of the initial content, including the largest element. Also, there is no waiting for data fetching or rendering on the client. * Interaction to Next Paint (INP): Static rendering provides a good foundation for INP, but doesn't guarantee optimal performance (typically ranges from 50-150 ms depending on implementation). While Server Components don't require hydration, any Client Components within the page still need JavaScript to become interactive. To achieve a very good INP score, you will need to make sure the Client Components within the page is minimal. * Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): While static rendering delivers the complete page structure upfront which can be very beneficial for CLS, achieving excellent CLS requires additional optimization strategies: * Static HTML alone doesn't prevent layout shifts if resources load asynchronously * Image dimensions must be properly specified to reserve space before the image loads * Web fonts can cause text to reflow if not handled properly with font display strategies * Dynamically injected content (ads, embeds, lazy-loaded elements) can disrupt layout stability * CSS implementation significantly impacts CLS—immediate availability of styling information helps maintain visual stability Code Examples: 1. Basic static rendering: ` 2. Static rendering with revalidation (ISR): ` 3. Static path generation: ` 2. Dynamic Rendering (Server Rendering Strategy) Dynamic Rendering generates HTML on the server for each request at request time. Unlike static rendering, the content is not pre-rendered or cached but freshly generated for each user. This kind of rendering works best for: * Personalized content: User dashboards, account pages * Real-time data: Stock prices, live sports scores * Request-specific information: Pages that use cookies, headers, or search parameters * Frequently changing data: Content that needs to be up-to-date on every request How Dynamic Rendering Affects Core Web Vitals * Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): With dynamic rendering, the server needs to generate HTML for each request, and that can't be fully cached at the CDN level. It is still faster than client-side rendering as HTML is generated on the server. * Interaction to Next Paint (INP): The performance is similar to static rendering once the page is loaded. However, it can become slower if the dynamic content includes many Client Components. * Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): Dynamic rendering can potentially introduce CLS if the data fetched at request time significantly alters the layout of the page compared to a static structure. However, if the layout is stable and the dynamic content size fits within predefined areas, the CLS can be managed effectively. Code Examples: 1. Explicit dynamic rendering: ` 2. Simplicit dynamic rendering with cookies: ` 3. Dynamic routes: ` 3. Streaming (Server Rendering Strategy) Streaming allows you to progressively render UI from the server. Instead of waiting for all the data to be ready before sending any HTML, the server sends chunks of HTML as they become available. This is implemented using React's Suspense boundary. React Suspense works by creating boundaries in your component tree that can "suspend" rendering while waiting for asynchronous operations. When a component inside a Suspense boundary throws a promise (which happens automatically with data fetching in React Server Components), React pauses rendering of that component and its children, renders the fallback UI specified in the Suspense component, continues rendering other parts of the page outside this boundary, and eventually resumes and replaces the fallback with the actual component once the promise resolves. When streaming, this mechanism allows the server to send the initial HTML with fallbacks for suspended components while continuing to process suspended components in the background. The server then streams additional HTML chunks as each suspended component resolves, including instructions for the browser to seamlessly replace fallbacks with final content. It works well for: * Pages with mixed data requirements: Some fast, some slow data sources * Improving perceived performance: Show users something quickly while slower parts load * Complex dashboards: Different widgets have different loading times * Handling slow APIs: Prevent slow third-party services from blocking the entire page How Streaming Affects Core Web Vitals * Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Streaming can improve the perceived LCP. By sending the initial HTML content quickly, including potentially the largest element, the browser can render it sooner. Even if other parts of the page are still loading, the user sees the main content faster. * Interaction to Next Paint (INP): Streaming can contribute to a better INP. When used with React's <Suspense />, interactive elements in the faster-loading parts of the page can become interactive earlier, even while other components are still being streamed in. This allows users to engage with the page sooner. * Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): Streaming can cause layout shifts as new content streams in. However, when implemented carefully, streaming should not negatively impact CLS. The initially streamed content should establish the main layout, and subsequent streamed chunks should ideally fit within this structure without causing significant reflows or layout shifts. Using placeholders and ensuring dimensions are known can help prevent CLS. Code Examples: 1. Basic Streaming with Suspense: ` 2. Nested Suspense boundaries for more granular control: ` 3. Using Next.js loading.js convention: ` 4. Client Components and Client-Side Rendering Client Components are defined using the React 'use client' directive. They are pre-rendered on the server but then hydrated on the client, enabling interactivity. This is different from pure client-side rendering (CSR), where rendering happens entirely in the browser. In the traditional sense of CSR (where the initial HTML is minimal, and all rendering happens in the browser), Next.js has moved away from this as a default approach but it can still be achievable by using dynamic imports and setting ssr: false. ` Despite the shift toward server rendering, there are valid use cases for CSR: 1. Private dashboards: Where SEO doesn't matter, and you want to reduce server load 2. Heavy interactive applications: Like data visualization tools or complex editors 3. Browser-only APIs: When you need access to browser-specific features like localStorage or WebGL 4. Third-party integrations: Some third-party widgets or libraries that only work in the browser While these are valid use cases, using Client Components is generally preferable to pure CSR in Next.js. Client Components give you the best of both worlds: server-rendered HTML for the initial load (improving SEO and LCP) with client-side interactivity after hydration. Pure CSR should be reserved for specific scenarios where server rendering is impossible or counterproductive. Client components are good for: * Interactive UI elements: Forms, dropdowns, modals, tabs * State-dependent UI: Components that change based on client state * Browser API access: Components that need localStorage, geolocation, etc. * Event-driven interactions: Click handlers, form submissions, animations * Real-time updates: Chat interfaces, live notifications How Client Components Affect Core Web Vitals * Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Initial HTML includes the server-rendered version of Client Components, so LCP is reasonably fast. Hydration can delay interactivity but doesn't necessarily affect LCP. * Interaction to Next Paint (INP): For Client Components, hydration can cause input delay during page load, and when the page is hydrated, performance depends on the efficiency of event handlers. Also, complex state management can impact responsiveness. * Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS): Client-side data fetching can cause layout shifts as new data arrives. Also, state changes might alter the layout unexpectedly. Using Client Components will require careful implementation to prevent shifts. Code Examples: 1. Basic Client Component: ` 2. Client Component with server data: ` Hybrid Approaches and Composition Patterns In real-world applications, you'll often use a combination of rendering strategies to achieve the best performance. Next.js makes it easy to compose Server and Client Components together. Server Components with Islands of Interactivity One of the most effective patterns is to use Server Components for the majority of your UI and add Client Components only where interactivity is needed. This approach: 1. Minimizes JavaScript sent to the client 2. Provides excellent initial load performance 3. Maintains good interactivity where needed ` Partial Prerendering (Next.js 15) Next.js 15 introduced Partial Prerendering, a new hybrid rendering strategy that combines static and dynamic content in a single route. This allows you to: 1. Statically generate a shell of the page 2. Stream in dynamic, personalized content 3. Get the best of both static and dynamic rendering Note: At the time of this writing, Partial Prerendering is experimental and is not ready for production use. Read more ` Measuring Core Web Vitals in Next.js Understanding the impact of your rendering strategy choices requires measuring Core Web Vitals in real-world conditions. Here are some approaches: 1. Vercel Analytics If you deploy on Vercel, you can use Vercel Analytics to automatically track Core Web Vitals for your production site: ` 2. Web Vitals API You can manually track Core Web Vitals using the web-vitals library: ` 3. Lighthouse and PageSpeed Insights For development and testing, use: * Chrome DevTools Lighthouse tab * PageSpeed Insights * Chrome User Experience Report Making Practical Decisions: Which Rendering Strategy to Choose? Choosing the right rendering strategy depends on your specific requirements. Here's a decision framework: Choose Static Rendering when * Content is the same for all users * Data can be determined at build time * Page doesn't need frequent updates * SEO is critical * You want the best possible performance Choose Dynamic Rendering when * Content is personalized for each user * Data must be fresh on every request * You need access to request-time information * Content changes frequently Choose Streaming when * Page has a mix of fast and slow data requirements * You want to improve perceived performance * Some parts of the page depend on slow APIs * You want to prioritize showing critical UI first Choose Client Components when * UI needs to be interactive * Component relies on browser APIs * UI changes frequently based on user input * You need real-time updates Conclusion Next.js provides a powerful set of rendering strategies that allow you to optimize for both performance and user experience. By understanding how each strategy affects Core Web Vitals, you can make informed decisions about how to build your application. Remember that the best approach is often a hybrid one, combining different rendering strategies based on the specific requirements of each part of your application. Start with Server Components as your default, use Static Rendering where possible, and add Client Components only where interactivity is needed. By following these principles and measuring your Core Web Vitals, you can create Next.js applications that are fast, responsive, and provide an excellent user experience....

Let's innovate together!

We're ready to be your trusted technical partners in your digital innovation journey.

Whether it's modernization or custom software solutions, our team of experts can guide you through best practices and how to build scalable, performant software that lasts.

Prefer email? hi@thisdot.co