General

Announcing Free Trainings - Progressive Web Apps and Using NgUpgrade for your Angular Migration

Published May 20, 2020

Updated Feb 14, 2023

1 min read

This article was written over 18 months ago and may contain information that is out of date. Some content may be relevant but please refer to the relevant official documentation or available resources for the latest information.

Less than two weeks after wrapping up our inaugural JavaScript Marathon, we are thrilled to share two brand new free trainings from the team at This Dot Labs - available for you to watch anytime.

In Introduction to PWAs and Service Workers, Software Engineer Pato Vargas will walk you through creating your first PWA, implementing push notifications, testing your features, and using Firebase.

"I really enjoyed working on this training," says Vargas, "learning service workers is important for any JavaScript developer, so this training appeals to anyone writing JavaScript!"

Software Engineer, Frederick Prijk, is also excited to present his new training series, Upgrading AngularJS to Angular Using NgUpgrade, which walks you through a simple AngularJS to Angular migration in just over an hour!

You can find these trainings, and all other past trainings, including those presented in the JavaScript Marathon series, by visiting our free resources page!

Introducing a new technology to your enterprise development team, or having trouble with an existing technology? Learn more about how This Dot Labs can tailor a training program to your team by chatting with us, or by reviewing the trainings we already offer!

This Dot is a consultancy dedicated to guiding companies through their modernization and digital transformation journeys. Specializing in replatforming, modernizing, and launching new initiatives, we stand out by taking true ownership of your engineering projects.

We love helping teams with projects that have missed their deadlines or helping keep your strategic digital initiatives on course. Check out our case studies and our clients that trust us with their engineering.

About the author(s)

This Dot

The Importance of a Scientific Mindset in Software Engineering: Part 2 (Debugging)

The Importance of a Scientific Mindset in Software Engineering: Part 2 (Debugging) In the first part of my series on the importance of a scientific mindset in software engineering, we explored how the principles of the scientific method can help us evaluate sources and make informed decisions. Now, we will focus on how these principles can help us tackle one of the most crucial and challenging tasks in software engineering: debugging. In software engineering, debugging is often viewed as an art - an intuitive skill honed through experience and trial and error. In a way, it is - the same as a GP, even a very evidence-based one, will likely diagnose most of their patients based on their experience and intuition and not research scientific literature every time; a software engineer will often rely on their experience and intuition to identify and fix common bugs. However, an internist faced with a complex case will likely not be able to rely on their intuition alone and must apply the scientific method to diagnose the patient. Similarly, a software engineer can benefit from using the scientific method to identify and fix the problem when faced with a complex bug. From that perspective, treating engineering challenges like scientific inquiries can transform the way we tackle problems. Rather than resorting to guesswork or gut feelings, we can apply the principles of the scientific method—forming hypotheses, designing controlled experiments, gathering and evaluating evidence—to identify and eliminate bugs systematically. This approach, sometimes referred to as "scientific debugging," reframes debugging from a haphazard process into a structured, disciplined practice. It encourages us to be skeptical, methodical, and transparent in our reasoning. For instance, as Andreas Zeller notes in the book _Why Programs Fail_, the key aspect of scientific debugging is its explicitness: Using the scientific method, you make your assumptions and reasoning explicit, allowing you to understand your assumptions and often reveals hidden clues that can lead to the root cause of the problem on hand. Note: If you'd like to read an excerpt from the book, you can find it on Embedded.com. Scientific Debugging At its core, scientific debugging applies the principles of the scientific method to the process of finding and fixing software defects. Rather than attempting random fixes or relying on intuition, it encourages engineers to move systematically, guided by data, hypotheses, and controlled experimentation. By adopting debugging as a rigorous inquiry, we can reduce guesswork, speed up the resolution process, and ensure that our fixes are based on solid evidence. Just as a scientist begins with a well-defined research question, a software engineer starts by identifying the specific symptom or error condition. For instance, if our users report inconsistencies in the data they see across different parts of the application, our research question could be: _"Under what conditions does the application display outdated or incorrect user data?"_ From there, we can follow a structured debugging process that mirrors the scientific method: - 1. Observe and Define the Problem: First, we need to clearly state the bug's symptoms and the environment in which it occurs. We should isolate whether the issue is deterministic or intermittent and identify any known triggers if possible. Such a structured definition serves as the groundwork for further investigation. - 2. Formulate a Hypothesis: A hypothesis in debugging is a testable explanation for the observed behavior. For instance, you might hypothesize: _"The data inconsistency occurs because a caching layer is serving stale data when certain user profiles are updated."_ The key is that this explanation must be falsifiable; if experiments don't support the hypothesis, it must be refined or discarded. - 3. Collect Evidence and Data: Evidence often includes logs, system metrics, error messages, and runtime traces. Similar to reviewing primary sources in academic research, treat your raw debugging data as crucial evidence. Evaluating these data points can reveal patterns. In our example, such patterns could be whether the bug correlates with specific caching mechanisms, increased memory usage, or database query latency. During this step, it's essential to approach data critically, just as you would analyze the quality and credibility of sources in a research literature review. Don't forget that even logs can be misleading, incomplete, or even incorrect, so cross-referencing multiple sources is key. - 4. Design and Run Experiments: Design minimal, controlled tests to confirm or refute your hypothesis. In our example, you may try disabling or shortening the cache's time-to-live (TTL) to see if more recent data is displayed correctly. By manipulating one variable at a time - such as cache invalidation intervals - you gain clearer insights into causation. Tools such as profilers, debuggers, or specialized test harnesses can help isolate factors and gather precise measurements. - 5. Analyze Results and Refine Hypotheses: If the experiment's outcome doesn't align with your hypothesis, treat it as a stepping stone, not a dead end. Adjust your explanation, form a new hypothesis, or consider additional variables (for example, whether certain API calls bypass caching). Each iteration should bring you closer to a better understanding of the bug's root cause. Remember, the goal is not to prove an initial guess right but to arrive at a verifiable explanation. - 6. Implement and Verify the Fix: Once you're confident in the identified cause, you can implement the fix. Verification doesn't stop at deployment - re-test under the same conditions and, if possible, beyond them. By confirming the fix in a controlled manner, you ensure that the solution is backed by evidence rather than wishful thinking. - Personally, I consider implementing end-to-end tests (e.g., with Playwright) that reproduce the bug and verify the fix to be a crucial part of this step. This both ensures that the bug doesn't reappear in the future due to changes in the codebase and avoids possible imprecisions of manual testing. Now, we can explore these steps in more detail, highlighting how the scientific method can guide us through the debugging process. Establishing Clear Debugging Questions (Formulating a Hypothesis) A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through experimentation. In a debugging context, that phenomenon is the bug or issue you're trying to resolve. Having a clear, falsifiable statement that you can prove or disprove ensures that you stay focused on the real problem rather than jumping haphazardly between possible causes. A properly formulated hypothesis lets you design precise experiments to evaluate whether your explanation holds true. To formulate a hypothesis effectively, you can follow these steps: 1. Clearly Identify the Symptom(s) Before forming any hypothesis, pin down the specific issue users are experiencing. For instance: - "Users intermittently see outdated profile information after updating their accounts." - "Some newly created user profiles don't reflect changes in certain parts of the application." Having a well-defined problem statement keeps your hypothesis focused on the actual issue. Just like a research question in science, the clarity of your symptom definition directly influences the quality of your hypothesis. 2. Draft a Tentative Explanation Next, convert your symptom into a statement that describes a _possible root cause_, such as: - "Data inconsistency occurs because the caching layer isn't invalidating or refreshing user data properly when profiles are updated." - "Stale data is displayed because the cache timeout is too long under certain load conditions." This step makes your assumption about the root cause explicit. As with the scientific method, your hypothesis should be something you can test and either confirm or refute with data or experimentation. 3. Ensure Falsifiability A valid hypothesis must be falsifiable - meaning it can be proven _wrong_. You'll struggle to design meaningful experiments if a hypothesis is too vague or broad. For example: - Not Falsifiable: "Occasionally, the application just shows weird data." - Falsifiable: "Users see stale data when the cache is not invalidated within 30 seconds of profile updates." Making your hypothesis specific enough to fail a test will pave the way for more precise debugging. 4. Align with Available Evidence Match your hypothesis to what you already know - logs, stack traces, metrics, and user reports. For example: - If logs reveal that cache invalidation events aren't firing, form a hypothesis explaining why those events fail or never occur. - If metrics show that data served from the cache is older than the configured TTL, hypothesize about how or why the TTL is being ignored. If your current explanation contradicts existing data, refine your hypothesis until it fits. 5. Plan for Controlled Tests Once you have a testable hypothesis, figure out how you'll attempt to _disprove_ it. This might involve: - Reproducing the environment: Set up a staging/local system that closely mimics production. For instance with the same cache layer configurations. - Varying one condition at a time: For example, only adjust cache invalidation policies or TTLs and then observe how data freshness changes. - Monitoring metrics: In our example, such monitoring would involve tracking user profile updates, cache hits/misses, and response times. These metrics should lead to confirming or rejecting your explanation. These plans become your blueprint for experiments in further debugging stages. Collecting and Evaluating Evidence After formulating a clear, testable hypothesis, the next crucial step is to gather data that can either support or refute it. This mirrors how scientists collect observations in a literature review or initial experiments. 1. Identify "Primary Sources" (Logs, Stack Traces, Code History): - Logs and Stack Traces: These are your direct pieces of evidence - treat them like raw experimental data. For instance, look closely at timestamps, caching-related events (e.g., invalidation triggers), and any error messages related to stale reads. - Code History: Look for related changes in your source control, e.g. using Git bisect. In our example, we would look for changes to caching mechanisms or references to cache libraries in commits, which could pinpoint when the inconsistency was introduced. Sometimes, reverting a commit that altered cache settings helps confirm whether the bug originated there. 2. Corroborate with "Secondary Sources" (Documentation, Q&A Forums): - Documentation: Check official docs for known behavior or configuration details that might differ from your assumptions. - Community Knowledge: Similar issues reported on GitHub or StackOverflow may reveal known pitfalls in a library you're using. 3. Assess Data Quality and Relevance: - Look for Patterns: For instance, does stale data appear only after certain update frequencies or at specific times of day? - Check Environmental Factors: For instance, does the bug happen only with particular deployment setups, container configurations, or memory constraints? - Watch Out for Biases: Avoid seeking only the data that confirms your hypothesis. Look for contradictory logs or metrics that might point to other root causes. You keep your hypothesis grounded in real-world system behavior by treating logs, stack traces, and code history as primary data - akin to raw experimental results. This evidence-first approach reduces guesswork and guides more precise experiments. Designing and Running Experiments With a hypothesis in hand and evidence gathered, it's time to test it through controlled experiments - much like scientists isolate variables to verify or debunk an explanation. 1. Set Up a Reproducible Environment: - Testing Environments: Replicate production conditions as closely as possible. In our example, that would involve ensuring the same caching configuration, library versions, and relevant data sets are in place. - Version Control Branches: Use a dedicated branch to experiment with different settings or configuration, e.g., cache invalidation strategies. This streamlines reverting changes if needed. 2. Control Variables One at a Time: - For instance, if you suspect data inconsistency is tied to cache invalidation events, first adjust only the invalidation timeout and re-test. - Or, if concurrency could be a factor (e.g., multiple requests updating user data simultaneously), test different concurrency levels to see if stale data issues become more pronounced. 3. Measure and Record Outcomes: - Automated Tests: Tests provide a great way to formalize and verify your assumptions. For instance, you could develop tests that intentionally update user profiles and check if the displayed data matches the latest state. - Monitoring Tools: Monitor relevant metrics before, during, and after each experiment. In our example, we might want to track cache hit rates, TTL durations, and query times. - Repeat Trials: Consistency across multiple runs boosts confidence in your findings. 4. Validate Against a Baseline: - If baseline tests manifest normal behavior, but your experimental changes manifest the bug, you've isolated the variable causing the issue. E.g. if the baseline tests show that data is consistently fresh under normal caching conditions but your experimental changes cause stale data. - Conversely, if your change eliminates the buggy behavior, it supports your hypothesis - e.g. that the cache configuration was the root cause. Each experiment outcome is a data point supporting or contradicting your hypothesis. Over time, these data points guide you toward the true cause. Analyzing Results and Iterating In scientific debugging, an unexpected result isn't a failure - it's valuable feedback that brings you closer to the right explanation. 1. Compare Outcomes to the hypothesis. For instance: - Did user data stay consistent after you reduced the cache TTL or fixed invalidation logic? - Did logs show caching events firing as expected, or did they reveal unexpected errors? - Are there only partial improvements that suggest multiple overlapping issues? 2. Incorporate Unexpected Observations: - Sometimes, debugging uncovers side effects - e.g. performance bottlenecks exposed by more frequent cache invalidations. Note these for future work. - If your hypothesis is disproven, revise it. For example, the cache may only be part of the problem, and a separate load balancer setting also needs attention. 3. Avoid Confirmation Bias: - Don't dismiss contrary data. For instance, if you see evidence that updates are fresh in some modules but stale in others, you may have found a more nuanced root cause (e.g., partial cache invalidation). - Consider other credible explanations if your teammates propose them. Test those with the same rigor. 4. Decide If You Need More Data: - If results aren't conclusive, add deeper instrumentation or enable debug modes to capture more detailed logs. - For production-only issues, implement distributed tracing or sampling logs to diagnose real-world usage patterns. 5. Document Each Iteration: - Record the results of each experiment, including any unexpected findings or new hypotheses that arise. - Through iterative experimentation and analysis, each cycle refines your understanding. By letting evidence shape your hypothesis, you ensure that your final conclusion aligns with reality. Implementing and Verifying the Fix Once you've identified the likely culprit - say, a misconfigured or missing cache invalidation policy - the next step is to implement a fix and verify its resilience. 1. Implementing the Change: - Scoped Changes: Adjust just the component pinpointed in your experiments. Avoid large-scale refactoring that might introduce other issues. - Code Reviews: Peer reviews can catch overlooked logic gaps or confirm that your changes align with best practices. 2. Regression Testing: - Re-run the same experiments that initially exposed the issue. In our stale data example, confirm that the data remains fresh under various conditions. - Conduct broader tests - like integration or end-to-end tests - to ensure no new bugs are introduced. 3. Monitoring in Production: - Even with positive test results, real-world scenarios can differ. Monitor logs and metrics (e.g. cache hit rates, user error reports) closely post-deployment. - If the buggy behavior reappears, revisit your hypothesis or consider additional factors, such as unpredicted user behavior. 4. Benchmarking and Performance Checks (If Relevant): - When making changes that affect the frequency of certain processes - such as how often a cache is refreshed - be sure to measure the performance impact. Verify you meet any latency or resource usage requirements. - Keep an eye on the trade-offs: For instance, more frequent cache invalidations might solve stale data but could also raise system load. By systematically verifying your fix - similar to confirming experimental results in research - you ensure that you've addressed the true cause and maintained overall software stability. Documenting the Debugging Process Good science relies on transparency, and so does effective debugging. Thorough documentation guarantees your findings are reproducible and valuable to future team members. 1. Record Your Hypothesis and Experiments: - Keep a concise log of your main hypothesis, the tests you performed, and the outcomes. - A simple markdown file within the repo can capture critical insights without being cumbersome. 2. Highlight Key Evidence and Observations: - Note the logs or metrics that were most instrumental - e.g., seeing repeated stale cache hits 10 minutes after updates. - Document any edge cases discovered along the way. 3. List Follow-Up Actions or Potential Risks: - If you discover additional issues - like memory spikes from more frequent invalidation - note them for future sprints. - Identify parts of the code that might need deeper testing or refactoring to prevent similar issues. 4. Share with Your Team: - Publish your debugging report on an internal wiki or ticket system. A well-documented troubleshooting narrative helps educate other developers. - Encouraging open discussion of the debugging process fosters a culture of continuous learning and collaboration. By paralleling scientific publication practices in your documentation, you establish a knowledge base to guide future debugging efforts and accelerate collective problem-solving. Conclusion Debugging can be as much a rigorous, methodical exercise as an art shaped by intuition and experience. By adopting the principles of scientific inquiry - forming hypotheses, designing controlled experiments, gathering evidence, and transparently documenting your process - you make your debugging approach both systematic and repeatable. The explicitness and structure of scientific debugging offer several benefits: - Better Root-Cause Discovery: Structured, hypothesis-driven debugging sheds light on the _true_ underlying factors causing defects rather than simply masking symptoms. - Informed Decisions: Data and evidence lead the way, minimizing guesswork and reducing the chance of reintroducing similar issues. - Knowledge Sharing: As in scientific research, detailed documentation of methods and outcomes helps others learn from your process and fosters a collaborative culture. Ultimately, whether you are diagnosing an intermittent crash or chasing elusive performance bottlenecks, scientific debugging brings clarity and objectivity to your workflow. By aligning your debugging practices with the scientific method, you build confidence in your solutions and empower your team to tackle complex software challenges with precision and reliability. But most importantly, do not get discouraged by the number of rigorous steps outlined above or by the fact you won't always manage to follow them all religiously. Debugging is a complex and often frustrating process, and it's okay to rely on your intuition and experience when needed. Feel free to adapt the debugging process to your needs and constraints, and as long as you keep the scientific mindset at heart, you'll be on the right track....

May 9, 2025

13 mins

JavaScript

The 2025 Guide to JS Build Tools

The 2025 Guide to JS Build Tools In 2025, we're seeing the largest number of JavaScript build tools being actively maintained and used in history. Over the past few years, we've seen the trend of many build tools being rewritten or forked to use a faster and more efficient language like Rust and Go. In the last year, new companies have emerged, even with venture capital funding, with the goal of working on specific sets of build tools. Void Zero is one such recent example. With so many build tools around, it can be difficult to get your head around and understand which one is for what. Hopefully, with this blog post, things will become a bit clearer. But first, let's explain some concepts. Concepts When it comes to build tools, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Each tool typically focuses on one or two primary features, and often relies on other tools as dependencies to accomplish more. While it might be difficult to explain here all of the possible functionalities a build tool might have, we've attempted to explain some of the most common ones so that you can easily understand how tools compare. Minification The concept of minification has been in the JavaScript ecosystem for a long time, and not without reason. JavaScript is typically delivered from the server to the user's browser through a network whose speed can vary. Thus, there was a need very early in the web development era to compress the source code as much as possible while still making it executable by the browser. This is done through the process of *minification*, which removes unnecessary whitespace, comments, and uses shorter variable names, reducing the total size of the file. This is what an unminified JavaScript looks like: ` This is the same file, minified: ` Closely related to minimizing is the concept of source maps#Source_mapping), which goes hand in hand with minimizing - source maps are essentially mappings between the minified file and the original source code. Why is that needed? Well, primarily for debugging minified code. Without source maps, understanding errors in minified code is nearly impossible because variable names are shortened, and all formatting is removed. With source maps, browser developer tools can help you debug minified code. Tree-Shaking *Tree-shaking* was the next-level upgrade from minification that became possible when ES modules were introduced into the JavaScript language. While a minified file is smaller than the original source code, it can still get quite large for larger apps, especially if it contains parts that are effectively not used. Tree shaking helps eliminate this by performing a static analysis of all your code, building a dependency graph of the modules and how they relate to each other, which allows the bundler to determine which exports are used and which are not. Once unused exports are found, the build tool will remove them entirely. This is also called *dead code elimination*. Bundling Development in JavaScript and TypeScript rarely involves a single file. Typically, we're talking about tens or hundreds of files, each containing a specific part of the application. If we were to deliver all those files to the browser, we would overwhelm both the browser and the network with many small requests. *Bundling* is the process of combining multiple JS/TS files (and often other assets like CSS, images, etc.) into one or more larger files. A bundler will typically start with an entry file and then recursively include every module or file that the entry file depends on, before outputting one or more files containing all the necessary code to deliver to the browser. As you might expect, a bundler will typically also involve minification and tree-shaking, as explained previously, in the process to deliver only the minimum amount of code necessary for the app to function. Transpiling Once TypeScript arrived on the scene, it became necessary to translate it to JavaScript, as browsers did not natively understand TypeScript. Generally speaking, the purpose of a *transpiler* is to transform one language into another. In the JavaScript ecosystem, it's most often used to transpile TypeScript code to JavaScript, optionally targeting a specific version of JavaScript that's supported by older browsers. However, it can also be used to transpile newer JavaScript to older versions. For example, arrow functions, which are specified in ES6, are converted into regular function declarations if the target language is ES5. Additionally, a transpiler can also be used by modern frameworks such as React to transpile JSX syntax (used in React) into plain JavaScript. Typically, with transpilers, the goal is to maintain similar abstractions in the target code. For example, transpiling TypeScript into JavaScript might preserve constructs like loops, conditionals, or function declarations that look natural in both languages. Compiling While a transpiler's purpose is to transform from one language to another without or with little optimization, the purpose of a *compiler* is to perform more extensive transformations and optimizations, or translate code from a high-level programming language into a lower-level one such as bytecode. The focus here is on optimizing for performance or resource efficiency. Unlike transpiling, compiling will often transform abstractions so that they suit the low-level representation, which can then run faster. Hot-Module Reloading (HMR) *Hot-module reloading* (HMR) is an important feature of modern build tools that drastically improves the developer experience while developing apps. In the early days of the web, whenever you'd make a change in your source code, you would need to hit that refresh button on the browser to see the change. This would become quite tedious over time, especially because with a full-page reload, you lose all the application state, such as the state of form inputs or other UI components. With HMR, we can update modules in real-time without requiring a full-page reload, speeding up the feedback loop for any changes made by developers. Not only that, but the full application state is typically preserved, making it easier to test and iterate on code. Development Server When developing web applications, you need to have a locally running development server set up on something like http://localhost:3000. A development server typically serves unminified code to the browser, allowing you to easily debug your application. Additionally, a development server will typically have hot module replacement (HMR) so that you can see the results on the browser as you are developing your application. The Tools Now that you understand the most important features of build tools, let's take a closer look at some of the popular tools available. This is by no means a complete list, as there have been many build tools in the past that were effective and popular at the time. However, here we will focus on those used by the current popular frameworks. In the table below, you can see an overview of all the tools we'll cover, along with the features they primarily focus on and those they support secondarily or through plugins. The tools are presented in alphabetical order below. Babel Babel, which celebrated its 10th anniversary since its initial release last year, is primarily a JavaScript transpiler used to convert modern JavaScript (ES6+) into backward-compatible JavaScript code that can run on older JavaScript engines. Traditionally, developers have used it to take advantage of the newer features of the JavaScript language without worrying about whether their code would run on older browsers. esbuild esbuild, created by Evan Wallace, the co-founder and former CTO of Figma, is primarily a bundler that advertises itself as being one of the fastest bundlers in the market. Unlike all the other tools on this list, esbuild is written in Go. When it was first released, it was unusual for a JavaScript bundler to be written in a language other than JavaScript. However, this choice has provided significant performance benefits. esbuild supports ESM and CommonJS modules, as well as CSS, TypeScript, and JSX. Unlike traditional bundlers, esbuild creates a separate bundle for each entry point file. Nowadays, it is used by tools like Vite and frameworks such as Angular. Metro Unlike other build tools mentioned here, which are mostly web-focused, Metro's primary focus is React Native. It has been specifically optimized for bundling, transforming, and serving JavaScript and assets for React Native apps. Internally, it utilizes Babel as part of its transformation process. Metro is sponsored by Meta and actively maintained by the Meta team. Oxc The JavaScript Oxidation Compiler, or Oxc, is a collection of Rust-based tools. Although it is referred to as a compiler, it is essentially a toolchain that includes a parser, linter, formatter, transpiler, minifier, and resolver. Oxc is sponsored by Void Zero and is set to become the backbone of other Void Zero tools, like Vite. Parcel Feature-wise, Parcel covers a lot of ground (no pun intended). Largely created by Devon Govett, it is designed as a zero-configuration build tool that supports bundling, minification, tree-shaking, transpiling, compiling, HMR, and a development server. It can utilize all the necessary types of assets you will need, from JavaScript to HTML, CSS, and images. The core part of it is mostly written in JavaScript, with a CSS transformer written in Rust, whereas it delegates the JavaScript compilation to a SWC. Likewise, it also has a large collection of community-maintained plugins. Overall, it is a good tool for quick development without requiring extensive configuration. Rolldown Rolldown is the future bundler for Vite, written in Rust and built on top of Oxc, currently leveraging its parser and resolver. Inspired by Rollup (hence the name), it will provide Rollup-compatible APIs and plugin interface, but it will be more similar to esbuild in scope. Currently, it is still in heavy development and it is not ready for production, but we should definitely be hearing more about this bundler in 2025 and beyond. Rollup Rollup is the current bundler for Vite. Originally created by Rich Harris, the creator of Svelte, Rollup is slowly becoming a veteran (speaking in JavaScript years) compared to other build tools here. When it originally launched, it introduced novel ideas focused on ES modules and tree-shaking, at the time when Webpack as its competitor was becoming too complex due to its extensive feature set - Rollup promised a simpler way with a straightforward configuration process that is easy to understand. Rolldown, mentioned previously, is hoped to become a replacement for Rollup at some point. Rsbuild Rsbuild is a high-performance build tool written in Rust and built on top of Rspack. Feature-wise, it has many similiarities with Vite. Both Rsbuild and Rspack are sponsored by the Web Infrastructure Team at ByteDance, which is a division of ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok. Rsbuild is built as a high-level tool on top of Rspack that has many additional features that Rspack itself doesn't provide, such as a better development server, image compression, and type checking. Rspack Rspack, as the name suggests, is a Rust-based alternative to Webpack. It offers a Webpack-compatible API, which is helpful if you are familiar with setting up Webpack configurations. However, if you are not, it might have a steep learning curve. To address this, the same team that built Rspack also developed Rsbuild, which helps you achieve a lot with out-of-the-box configuration. Under the hood, Rspack uses SWC for compiling and transpiling. Feature-wise, it’s quite robust. It includes built-in support for TypeScript, JSX, Sass, Less, CSS modules, Wasm, and more, as well as features like module federation, PostCSS, Lightning CSS, and others. Snowpack Snowpack was created around the same time as Vite, with both aiming to address similar needs in modern web development. Their primary focus was on faster build times and leveraging ES modules. Both Snowpack and Vite introduced a novel idea at the time: instead of bundling files while running a local development server, like traditional bundlers, they served the app unbundled. Each file was built only once and then cached indefinitely. When a file changed, only that specific file was rebuilt. For production builds, Snowpack relied on external bundlers such as Webpack, Rollup, or esbuild. Unfortunately, Snowpack is a tool you’re likely to hear less and less about in the future. It is no longer actively developed, and Vite has become the recommended alternative. SWC SWC, which stands for Speedy Web Compiler, can be used for both compilation and bundling (with the help of SWCpack), although compilation is its primary feature. And it really is speedy, thanks to being written in Rust, as are many other tools on this list. Primarily advertised as an alternative to Babel, its SWC is roughly 20x faster than Babel on a single thread. SWC compiles TypeScript to JavaScript, JSX to JavaScript, and more. It is used by tools such as Parcel and Rspack and by frameworks such as Next.js, which are used for transpiling and minification. SWCpack is the bundling part of SWC. However, active development within the SWC ecosystem is not currently a priority. The main author of SWC now works for Turbopack by Vercel, and the documentation states that SWCpack is presently not in active development. Terser Terser has the smallest scope compared to other tools from this list, but considering that it's used in many of those tools, it's worth separating it into its own section. Terser's primary role is minification. It is the successor to the older UglifyJS, but with better performance and ES6+ support. Vite Vite is a somewhat of a special beast. It's primarily a development server, but calling it just that would be an understatement, as it combines the features of a fast development server with modern build capabilities. Vite shines in different ways depending on how it's used. During development, it provides a fast server that doesn't bundle code like traditional bundlers (e.g., Webpack). Instead, it uses native ES modules, serving them directly to the browser. Since the code isn't bundled, Vite also delivers fast HMR, so any updates you make are nearly instant. Vite uses two bundlers under the hood. During development, it uses esbuild, which also allows it to act as a TypeScript transpiler. For each file you work on, it creates a file for the browser, allowing an easy separation between files which helps HMR. For production, it uses Rollup, which generates a single file for the browser. However, Rollup is not as fast as esbuild, so production builds can be a bit slower than you might expect. (This is why Rollup is being rewritten in Rust as Rolldown. Once complete, you'll have the same bundler for both development and production.) Traditionally, Vite has been used for client-side apps, but with the new Environment API released in Vite 6.0, it bridges the gap between client-side and server-rendered apps. Turbopack Turbopack is a bundler, written in Rust by the creators of webpack and Next.js at Vercel. The idea behind Turbopack was to do a complete rewrite of Webpack from scratch and try to keep a Webpack compatible API as much as possible. This is not an easy feat, and this task is still not over. The enormous popularity of Next.js is also helping Turbopack gain traction in the developer community. Right now, Turbopack is being used as an opt-in feature in Next.js's dev server. Production builds are not yet supported but are planned for future releases. Webpack And finally we arrive at Webpack, the legend among bundlers which has had a dominant position as the primary bundler for a long time. Despite the fact that there are so many alternatives to Webpack now (as we've seen in this blog post), it is still widely used, and some modern frameworks such as Next.js still have it as a default bundler. Initially released back in 2012, its development is still going strong. Its primary features are bundling, code splitting, and HMR, but other features are available as well thanks to its popular plugin system. Configuring Webpack has traditionally been challenging, and since it's written in JavaScript rather than a lower-level language like Rust, its performance lags behind compared to newer tools. As a result, many developers are gradually moving away from it. Conclusion With so many build tools in today's JavaScript ecosystem, many of which are similarly named, it's easy to get lost. Hopefully, this blog post was a useful overview of the tools that are most likely to continue being relevant in 2025. Although, with the speed of development, it may as well be that we will be seeing a completely different picture in 2026!...

Feb 14, 2025

12 mins

JavaScriptDevTools

Announcing July JavaScript Marathon - Free, online training!

Join us July 22nd, 2020 for our next JavaScript Marathon! JavaScript Marathon is a full day of free, online courses on Angular, React, Vue, RxJS, and Web Performance. Come learn about some of the leading web development technologies, and concepts! Stay for one training, or stick around for the whole day! No two sessions will be the same! --- Featuring Shawn Wang @ 11:00am - 12:00pm EDT In this session we will learn how to build a fullstack serverless React + GraphQL app from scratch with authentication, storage, and multiplayer realtime collaboration, all atop infinitely scalable AWS components, with AWS Amplify! It's never been this easy to go from idea to prototype, and each piece will be livecoded in front of your very eyes! --- Featuring Michael Hladky @ 12:30pm - 1:30pm EDT The async pipe is boring! Understand the guts of Angulars change detection and why zone.js is your biggest enemy. Learn the tricks on template bindings, component rendering, and where you pay the biggest price. As a cutting edge demo, you will understand how to analyze blocking UIs over flame charts and how to avoid them. In the end, you will be able to get zone-less performance even in zone-full Angular applications! --- Featuring Nathan Walker @ 2:00pm - 3:00pm EDT During this introduction to Nativescript, you’ll get a brief overview of what Nativescript is and how it works. You’ll also learn how to create a TypeScript, Angular, Vue, and React based app, + so much more! --- Featuring Cecelia Martinez @ 3:30pm - 4:30pm EDT Looking to add testing to your skill set or just feel more confident pushing to production? In this beginner-level talk, we will walk through the process of installing, configuring, and writing a critical-path test using Cypress. Written in JavaScript and built on the popular Mocha and Chai libraries, the free and open-source Cypress Test Runner gets you up to speed with end-to-end testing fast. We will also cover general testing strategies for beginners, including how to decide what to test and how to ensure your test suite is effective. --- Featuring Jesse Tomchak @ 5:00pm - 6:00pm EDT Setting up user authorization and authentication can be a minefield of security practices, token verification, valid callback urls, salt hashes, and more. Now take all those struggles and sprinkle them over serverless functions! When all we want to do is get past the login page to our actual application. We'll walk through setting up secure oAuth with AWS Lambda functions, covering common pitfalls, so that you can get back to the fun part of your project. --- Tune in next month for another full day of JavaScript Marathon! Need private trainings for your company? If you would like to learn more about how you can leverage This Dot’s expertise to upskill your team, and reinvigorate your developers with new knowledge about the web’s leading development technologies, visit the trainings page....

Jul 8, 2020

4 mins

EnterpriseGeneralJavaScriptTraining

Next.js + MongoDB Connection Storming

Building a Next.js application connected to MongoDB can feel like a match made in heaven. MongoDB stores all of its data as JSON objects, which don’t require transformation into JavaScript objects like relational SQL data does. However, when deploying your application to a serverless production environment such as Vercel, it is crucial to manage your database connections properly. If you encounter errors like these, you may be experiencing Connection Storming: * MongoServerSelectionError: connect ECONNREFUSED <IP_ADDRESS>:<PORT> * MongoNetworkError: failed to connect to server [<hostname>:<port>] on first connect * MongoTimeoutError: Server selection timed out after <x> ms * MongoTopologyClosedError: Topology is closed, please connect * Mongo Atlas: Connections % of configured limit has gone above 80 Connection storming occurs when your application has to mount a connection to Mongo for every serverless function or API endpoint call. Vercel executes your application’s code in a highly concurrent and isolated fashion. So, if you create new database connections on each request, your app might quickly exceed the connection limit of your database. We can leverage Vercel’s fluid compute model to keep our database connection objects warm across function invocations. Traditional serverless architecture was designed for quick, stateless web app transactions. Now, especially with the rise of LLM-oriented applications built with Next.js, interactions with applications are becoming more sequential. We just need to ensure that we assign our MongoDB connection to a global variable. Protip: Use global variables Vercel’s fluid compute model means all memory, including global constants like a MongoDB client, stays initialized between requests as long as the instance remains active. By assigning your MongoDB client to a global constant, you avoid redundant setup work and reduce the overhead of cold starts. This enables a more efficient approach to reusing connections for your application’s MongoDB client. The example below demonstrates how to retrieve an array of users from the users collection in MongoDB and either return them through an API request to /api/users or render them as an HTML list at the /users route. To support this, we initialize a global clientPromise variable that maintains the MongoDB connection across warm serverless executions, avoiding re-initialization on every request. ` Using this database connection in your API route code is easy: ` You can also use this database connection in your server-side rendered React components. ` In serverless environments like Vercel, managing database connections efficiently is key to avoiding connection storming. By reusing global variables and understanding the serverless execution model, you can ensure your Next.js app remains stable and performant....

Jul 11, 2025

3 mins

NextJSJavaScript

Let's innovate together!

We're ready to be your trusted technical partners in your digital innovation journey.

Whether it's modernization or custom software solutions, our team of experts can guide you through best practices and how to build scalable, performant software that lasts.