Angular

A Guide to Custom Angular Attribute Directives

Published May 31, 2023

Updated Nov 22, 2023

4 min read

This article was written over 18 months ago and may contain information that is out of date. Some content may be relevant but please refer to the relevant official documentation or available resources for the latest information.

When working inside of Angular applications you may have noticed special attributes such as NgClass, NgStyle and NgModel. These are special attributes that you can add to elements and components that are known as attribute directives. In this article, I will cover how these attributes are created and show a couple of examples.

What are Attribute Directives?

Angular directives are special constructs that allow modification of HTML elements and components. Attribute directives are also applied through attributes, hence the name. There exist other types of directives such as structural directives as well, but we’re just going to focus on attribute directives.

If you’ve used Angular before then you have almost certainly used a couple of the attribute directives I mentioned earlier before. You are not limited to just the built-in directives though. Angular allows you to create your own!

Creating Attribute Directives

Directives can be created using code generation via the ng CLI tool.

ng generate directive <directive_name_here>

This will create a file to house your directive and also an accompanying test file as well. The contents of the directive are very barebones to start with.

Let’s take a look.

import { Directive } from '@angular/core';

@Directive({
  selector: '[appExample]',
})
export class ExampleDirective {
  constructor() {}
}

You will see here that directives are created using a @Directive decorator. The selector in this case is the name of the attribute as it is intended to be used in your templates. The square brackets around the name make it an attribute selector, which is what we want for a custom attribute directive. I would also recommend that a prefix is always used for directive names to minimize the risk of conflicts. It should also go without saying to avoid using the ng prefix for custom directives to avoid confusion.

Now, let’s go over the lifecycle of a directive. The constructor is called with a reference to the ElementRef that the directive was bound to. You can do any initialization here if needed. This element reference is dependency injected, and will be available outside the constructor as well. You can also set up @HostListener handlers if you need to add functionality that runs in response to user interaction with the element or component, and @Input properties if you need to pass data to the directive.

Click Away Directive

One useful directive that doesn’t come standard is a click away directive. This is one that I have used before in my projects, and is very easy to understand. This directive uses host listeners to listen for user input, and determine whether the element that directive is attached to should be visible or not after the click event occurs.

@Directive({
  selector: '[appClickAway]',
})
export class ClickAwayDirective {
  @Output() onClickAway: EventEmitter<PointerEvent> = new EventEmitter();

  constructor(private elementRef: ElementRef) {}

  @HostListener('document:click', ['$event'])
  onClick(event: PointerEvent): void {
    if (!this.elementRef.nativeElement.contains(event.target)) {
      this.onClickAway.emit(event);
    }
  }
}

There are a few new things in this directive we’ll briefly go over. The first thing is the event emitter output onClickAway. A generic directive isn’t going to know how to handle click away behavior by itself as this will change based on your use case when using the directive. To solve this issue, we make the directive emit an event that the user of the directive can listen for.

The other part is the click handler. We use @HostListener to attach a click handler so we can run our click away logic whenever clicks are done. The one interesting thing about this directive is that it listens to all click events since we’ve specified ‘document’ in the first parameter. The reason for this is because we care about listening for clicking anything that isn’t the element or component that the directive is attached to.

If we didn’t do this, then the event handler would only fire when clicking on the component the directive is attached to, which defeats the purpose of a click away handler. Once we’ve determined the element was not clicked, we emit the aforementioned event.

Using this directive makes it trivial to implement click away functionality for both modals and context menus alike. If we have a custom dialog component we could hook it up like this:

<div class="shadow">
  <div class="dialog" appClickAway (onClickAway)="clickAway($event)">
    <h2>Dialog Box</h2>
    <p>This is a paragraph with content!</p>
  </div>
</div>

If you want to see this directive in action, then you can find it in our blog demos repo here.

Drag and Drop Directive

Another useful directive is one that assists with drag and drop operations. The following directive makes elements draggable, and executes a function with a reference to the location where the element was dragged to.

@Directive({
  selector: '[appDragDrop]',
})
export class DragDropDirective implements OnInit, OnDestroy {
  @Output() onDragDrop: EventEmitter<MouseEvent> = new EventEmitter();

  mouseDown$ = new Subject<MouseEvent>();
  mouseUp$ = new Subject<MouseEvent>();
  destroy$ = new Subject();

  constructor(private elementRef: ElementRef) {}

  ngOnInit(): void {
    this.mouseDown$
      .pipe(takeUntil(this.destroy$))
      .pipe(exhaustMap(() => this.mouseUp$.pipe(take(1))))
      .subscribe((event) => {
        if (
          event.target &&
          event.target instanceof Element &&
          !this.elementRef.nativeElement.contains(event.target)
        ) {
          this.onDragDrop.emit(event);
        }
      });
  }

  ngOnDestroy(): void {
    this.destroy$.next(null);
    this.destroy$.complete();
  }

  @HostListener('mousedown', ['$event'])
  onMouseDown(event: MouseEvent): void {
    this.mouseDown$.next(event);
  }

  @HostListener('document:mouseup', ['$event'])
  onMouseUp(event: MouseEvent): void {
    this.mouseUp$.next(event);
  }
}

Just like the previous directive example an event emitter is used so the user of the directive can associate custom functionality with it. RxJs is also utilized for the drag and drop detection. This directive uses the exhaustMap function to create an observable that emits both after a mouse down, and finally a mouse up is done. With that observable, we can subscribe to it and call the drag and drop callback so long as the element that’s dragged on isn’t the component itself.

Note how the mouse down event is local to the component while the mouse up event is attached to the document. For mouse down, this is done since we only want the start of the dragging to be initiated from clicking the component itself. The mouse up must listen to the document since the dragging has to end on something that isn’t the component that we’re dragging.

Just like the previous directive, we simply need to reference the attribute and register an event handler.

<div class="drag-drop-demo" appDragDrop (onDragDrop)="drop($event)">
  Drag me over something!
</div>

Conclusion

In this article, we have learned how to write our own custom attribute directives and demonstrated a couple of practical examples of directives you might use or encounter in the real world. I hope you found this introduction to directives useful, and that it helps you with writing your own directives in the future! You can find the examples shown here in our blog demos repository if you want to use them yourself.

This Dot is a consultancy dedicated to guiding companies through their modernization and digital transformation journeys. Specializing in replatforming, modernizing, and launching new initiatives, we stand out by taking true ownership of your engineering projects.

We love helping teams with projects that have missed their deadlines or helping keep your strategic digital initiatives on course. Check out our case studies and our clients that trust us with their engineering.

About the author(s)

Jamie Kuppens
I’m a software engineer with an interest in web development and some more esoteric things like emulator development.
@Reshurum @Reshurum

Exploring Angular Forms: A New Alternative with Signals

Exploring Angular Forms: A New Alternative with Signals In the world of Angular, forms are essential for user interaction, whether you're crafting a simple login page or a more complex user profile interface. Angular traditionally offers two primary approaches: template-driven forms and reactive forms. In my previous series on Angular Reactive Forms, I explored how to harness reactive forms' power to manage complex logic, create dynamic forms, and build custom form controls. A new tool for managing reactivity - signals - has been introduced in version 16 of Angular and has been the focus of Angular maintainers ever since, becoming stable with version 17. Signals allow you to handle state changes declaratively, offering an exciting alternative that combines the simplicity of template-driven forms with the robust reactivity of reactive forms. This article will examine how signals can add reactivity to both simple and complex forms in Angular. Recap: Angular Forms Approaches Before diving into the topic of enhancing template-driven forms with signals, let’s quickly recap Angular's traditional forms approaches: 1. Template-Driven Forms: Defined directly in the HTML template using directives like ngModel, these forms are easy to set up and are ideal for simple forms. However, they may not provide the fine-grained control required for more complex scenarios. Here's a minimal example of a template-driven form: ` ` 2. Reactive Forms: Managed programmatically in the component class using Angular's FormGroup, FormControl, and FormArray classes; reactive forms offer granular control over form state and validation. This approach is well-suited for complex forms, as my previous articles on Angular Reactive Forms discussed. And here's a minimal example of a reactive form: ` ` Introducing Signals as a New Way to Handle Form Reactivity With the release of Angular 16, signals have emerged as a new way to manage reactivity. Signals provide a declarative approach to state management, making your code more predictable and easier to understand. When applied to forms, signals can enhance the simplicity of template-driven forms while offering the reactivity and control typically associated with reactive forms. Let’s explore how signals can be used in both simple and complex form scenarios. Example 1: A Simple Template-Driven Form with Signals Consider a basic login form. Typically, this would be implemented using template-driven forms like this: ` ` This approach works well for simple forms, but by introducing signals, we can keep the simplicity while adding reactive capabilities: ` ` In this example, the form fields are defined as signals, allowing for reactive updates whenever the form state changes. The formValue signal provides a computed value that reflects the current state of the form. This approach offers a more declarative way to manage form state and reactivity, combining the simplicity of template-driven forms with the power of signals. You may be tempted to define the form directly as an object inside a signal. While such an approach may seem more concise, typing into the individual fields does not dispatch reactivity updates, which is usually a deal breaker. Here’s an example StackBlitz with a component suffering from such an issue: Therefore, if you'd like to react to changes in the form fields, it's better to define each field as a separate signal. By defining each form field as a separate signal, you ensure that changes to individual fields trigger reactivity updates correctly. Example 2: A Complex Form with Signals You may see little benefit in using signals for simple forms like the login form above, but they truly shine when handling more complex forms. Let's explore a more intricate scenario - a user profile form that includes fields like firstName, lastName, email, phoneNumbers, and address. The phoneNumbers field is dynamic, allowing users to add or remove phone numbers as needed. Here's how this form might be defined using signals: ` > Notice that the phoneNumbers field is defined as a signal of an array of signals. This structure allows us to track changes to individual phone numbers and update the form state reactively. The addPhoneNumber and removePhoneNumber methods update the phoneNumbers signal array, triggering reactivity updates in the form. ` > In the template, we use the phoneNumbers signal array to dynamically render the phone number input fields. The addPhoneNumber and removePhoneNumber methods allow users to reactively add or remove phone numbers, updating the form state. Notice the usage of the track function, which is necessary to ensure that the ngFor directive tracks changes to the phoneNumbers array correctly. Here's a StackBlitz demo of the complex form example for you to play around with: Validating Forms with Signals Validation is critical to any form, ensuring that user input meets the required criteria before submission. With signals, validation can be handled in a reactive and declarative manner. In the complex form example above, we've implemented a computed signal called formValid, which checks whether all fields meet specific validation criteria. The validation logic can easily be customized to accommodate different rules, such as checking for valid email formats or ensuring that all required fields are filled out. Using signals for validation allows you to create more maintainable and testable code, as the validation rules are clearly defined and react automatically to changes in form fields. It can even be abstracted into a separate utility to make it reusable across different forms. In the complex form example, the formValid signal ensures that all required fields are filled and validates the email and phone numbers format. This approach to validation is a bit simple and needs to be better connected to the actual form fields. While it will work for many use cases, in some cases, you might want to wait until explicit "signal forms" support is added to Angular. Tim Deschryver started implementing some abstractions around signal forms, including validation and wrote an article about it. Let's see if something like this will be added to Angular in the future. Why Use Signals in Angular Forms? The adoption of signals in Angular provides a powerful new way to manage form state and reactivity. Signals offer a flexible, declarative approach that can simplify complex form handling by combining the strengths of template-driven forms and reactive forms. Here are some key benefits of using signals in Angular forms: 1. Declarative State Management: Signals allow you to define form fields and computed values declaratively, making your code more predictable and easier to understand. 2. Reactivity: Signals provide reactive updates to form fields, ensuring that changes to the form state trigger reactivity updates automatically. 3. Granular Control: Signals allow you to define form fields at a granular level, enabling fine-grained control over form state and validation. 4. Dynamic Forms: Signals can be used to create dynamic forms with fields that can be added or removed dynamically, providing a flexible way to handle complex form scenarios. 5. Simplicity: Signals can offer a simpler, more concise way to manage form states than traditional reactive forms, making building and maintaining complex forms easier. Conclusion In my previous articles, we explored the powerful features of Angular reactive forms, from dynamic form construction to custom form controls. With the introduction of signals, Angular developers have a new tool that merges the simplicity of template-driven forms with the reactivity of reactive forms. While many use cases warrant Reactive Forms, signals provide a fresh, powerful alternative for managing form state in Angular applications requiring a more straightforward, declarative approach. As Angular continues to evolve, experimenting with these new features will help you build more maintainable, performant applications. Happy coding!...

Oct 4, 2024

5 mins

AngularJavaScript

Overview of the New Signal APIs in Angular

Overview of the New Signal APIs in Angular Google's Minko Gechev and Jeremy Elbourn announced many exciting things at NG Conf 2024. Among them is the addition of several new signal-based APIs. They are already in developer preview, so we can play around with them. Let's dig into it, starting with signal-based inputs and the new matching outputs API. Signal Based Inputs Discussions about signal-based inputs have been taking place in the Angular community for some time now, and they are finally here. Until now, you used the @Input() decorator to define inputs. This is what you'd have to write in your component to declare an optional and a required input: ` With the new signal-based inputs, you can write much less boilerplate code. Here is how you can define the same inputs using the new syntax: ` It's not only less boilerplate, but because the values are signals, you can also use them directly in computed signals and effects. That, effectively, means you get to avoid computing combined values in ngOnChanges or using setters for your inputs to be able to compute derived values. In addition, input signals are read-only. The New Output I intentionally avoid calling them signal-based outputs because they are not. They still work the same way as the old outputs. The Angular team has just introduced a new output API that is more consistent with the latest inputs API and allows you to write less boilerplate, similar to the new input API. Here is how you would define an output until now: ` Here is how you can define the same output using the new syntax: ` The thing I like about the new output API is that sometimes it happens to me that I forget to instantiate the EventEmitter because I do this instead: ` You won't forget to instantiate the output with the new syntax because the output function does it for you. Signal Queries I am sure most readers know the @ViewChild, @ViewChildren, @ContentChild, and @ContentChildren decorators very well and have experienced the pain of triggering the infamous ExpressionChangedAfterItHasBeenCheckedError or having the values unavailable when needed. Here is a refresher on how you would use these decorators until now: ` With the new signal queries, similar to the new input API, the values are signals, and you can use them directly in computed signals and effects. You can define the same queries using the new syntax: ` Jeremy Elbourn mentioned that the new signal queries have better type inference and are more consistent with the new input and output APIs. He also showcased a brand new feature not available with the old queries. You can now define a query as required, and the Angular compiler will throw an error if the query has no result, guaranteeing that the value won't be undefined. Here is how you can define a required query: ` Model Inputs Jeremy and Minko announced the last new feature is the model inputs. The name is vague, but the feature is cool—it simplifies the definition of two-way bindings. Until now, to achieve two-way binding, you would have to define an input and an output following a given naming convention. @Input and @Output had to be defined with the same name (followed by "Change" in the case of the output). Then, you could use the template's [()] syntax. ` ` That way, you could keep the value in sync between the parent and the child component. With the new model inputs, you can define a two-way binding with a single line of code. Here is how you can define the same two-way binding using the new syntax: ` The html template stays the same: ` The model function returns a writable signal that can be updated directly. The value will be propagated back to any two-way bindings. Conclusion The new signal-based APIs are a great addition to Angular. They allow you to write less boilerplate code and make your components more reactive. The new APIs are already in developer preview, so you can start playing around with them today. I look forward to seeing how the community will adopt these new features and what other exciting things the Angular team has in store for us, such as zoneless apps by default....

Apr 3, 2024

3 mins

AngularJavaScript

Integrating Playwright Tests into Your GitHub Workflow with Vercel

Vercel previews offer a great way to test PRs for a project. They have a predefined environment and don’t require any additional setup work from the reviewer to test changes quickly. Many projects also use end-to-end tests with Playwright as part of the review process to ensure that no regressions slip uncaught. Usually, workflows configure Playwright to run against a project running on the GitHub action worker itself, maybe with dependencies in Docker containers as well, however, why bother setting that all up and configuring yet another environment for your app to run in when there’s a working preview right there? Not only that, the Vercel preview will be more similar to production as it’s running on the same infrastructure, allowing you to be more confident about the accuracy of your tests. In this article, I’ll show you how you can run Playwright against the Vercel preview associated with a PR. Setting up the Vercel Project To set up a project in Vercel, we first need to have a codebase. I’m going to use the Next.js starter, but you can use whatever you like. What technology stack you use for this project won’t matter, as integrating Playwright with it will be the same experience. You can create a Next.js project with the following command: ` If you’ve selected all of the defaults, you should be able to run npm run dev and navigate to the app at http://localhost:3000. Setting up Playwright We will set up Playwright the standard way and make a few small changes to the configuration and the example test so that they run against our site and not the Playwright site. Setup Playwright in our existing project by running the following command: ` Install all browsers when prompted, and for the workflow question, say no since the one we’re going to use will work differently than the default one. The default workflow doesn’t set up a development server by default, and if that is enabled, it will run on the GitHub action virtual machine instead of against our Vercel deployment. To make Playwright run tests against the Vercel deployment, we’ll need to define a baseUrl in playwright.config.ts and send an additional header called X-Vercel-Protection-Bypass where we'll pass the bypass secret that we generated earlier so that we don’t get blocked from making requests to the deployment. I’ll cover how to add this environment variable to GitHub later. ` Our GitHub workflow will set the DEPLOYMENT_URL environment variable automatically. Now, in tests/example.spec.ts let’s rewrite the tests to work against the Next.js starter that we generated earlier: ` This is similar to the default test provided by Playwright. The main difference is we’re loading pages relative to baseURL instead of Playwright’s website. With that done and your Next.js dev server running, you should be able to run npx playwright test and see 6 passing tests against your local server. Now that the boilerplate is handled let’s get to the interesting part. The Workflow There is a lot going on in the workflow that we’ll be using, so we’ll go through it step by step, starting from the top. At the top of the file, we name the workflow and specify when it will run. ` This workflow will run against new PRs against the default branch and whenever new commits are merged against it. If you only want the workflow to run against PRs, you can remove the push object. Be careful about running workflows against your main branch if the deployment associated with it in Vercel is the production deployment. Some tests might not be safe to run against production such as destructive tests or those that modify customer data. In our simple example, however, this isn’t something to worry about. Installing Playwright in the Virtual Machine Workflows have jobs associated with them, and each job has multiple steps. Our test job takes a few steps to set up our project and install Playwright. ` The actions/checkout@v4 step clones our code since it isn’t available straight out of the gate. After that, we install Node v22 with actions/setup-node@v4, which, at the time of writing this article, is the latest LTS available. The latest LTS version of Node should always work with Playwright. With the project cloned and Node installed, we can install dependencies now. We run npm ci to install packages using the versions specified in the lock file. After our JS dependencies are installed, we have to install dependencies for Playwright now. sudo npx playwright install-deps installs all system dependencies that Playwright needs to work using apt, which is the package manager used by Ubuntu. This command needs to be run as the administrative user since higher privilege is needed to install system packages. Playwright’s dependencies aren’t all available in npm because the browser engines are native code that has native library dependencies that aren’t in the registry. Vercel Preview URL and GitHub Action Await Vercel The next couple of steps is where the magic happens. We need two things to happen to run our tests against the deployment. First, we need the URL of the deployment we want to test. Second, we want to wait until the deployment is ready to go before we run our tests. We have written about this topic before on our blog if you want more information about this step, but we’ll reiterate some of that here. Thankfully, the community has created GitHub actions that allow us to do this called zentered/vercel-preview-url and UnlyEd/github-action-await-vercel. Here is how you can use these actions: ` There are a few things to take note of here. Firstly, some variables need to be set that will differ from project to project. vercel_app in the zentered/vercel-preview-url step needs to be set to the name of your project in Vercel that was created earlier. The other variable that you need is the VERCEL_TOKEN environment variable. You can get this by going to Vercel > Account Settings > Tokens and creating a token in the form that appears. For the scope, select the account that has your project. To put VERCEL_TOKEN into GitHub, navigate to your repo, go to Settings > Secrets and variables > Actions and add it to Repository secrets. We should also add VERCEL_AUTOMATION_BYPASS_SECRETl. In Vercel, go to your project then navigate to Settings > Deployment Protection > Protection Bypass for Automation. From here you can add the secret, copy it to your clipboard, and put it in your GitHub action environment variables just like we did with VERCEL_TOKEN. With the variables taken care of, let’s take a look at how these two steps work together. You will notice that the zentered/vercel-preview-url step has an ID set to vercel_preview_url. We need this so we can pass the URL we receive to the UnlyEd/github-action-await-vercel action, as it needs a URL to know which deployment to wait on. Running Playwright After the last steps we just added, our deployment should be ready to go, and we can run our tests! The following steps will run the Playwright tests against the deployment and save the results to GitHub: ` In the first step, where we run the tests, we pass in the environment variables needed by our Playwright configuration that’s stored in playwright.config.ts. DEPLOYMENT_URL uses the Vercel deployment URL we got in an earlier step, and VERCEL_AUTOMATION_BYPASS_SECRET gets passed the secret with the same name directly from the GitHub secret store. The second step uploads a report of how the tests did to GitHub, regardless of whether they’ve passed or failed. If you need to access these reports, you can find them in the GitHub action log. There will be a link in the last step that will allow you to download a zip file. Once this workflow is in the default branch, it should start working for all new PRs! It’s important to note that this won’t work for forked PRs unless they are explicitly approved, as that’s a potential security hazard that can lead to secrets being leaked. You can read more about this in the GitHub documentation. One Caveat There’s one caveat that is worth mentioning with this approach, which is latency. Since your application is being served by Vercel and not locally on the GitHub action instance itself, there will be longer round-trips to it. This could result in your tests taking longer to execute. How much latency there is can vary based on what region your runner ends up being hosted in and whether the pages you’re loading are served from the edge or not. Conclusion Running your Playwright tests against Vercel preview deployments provides a robust way of running your tests against new code in an environment that more closely aligns with production. Doing this also eliminates the need to create and maintain a 2nd test environment under which your project needs to work....

Feb 25, 2025

7 mins

VercelPlaywrightGitHub

“We were seen as amplifiers, not collaborators,” Ashley Willis, Sr. Director of Developer Relations at GitHub, on How DevRel has Changed, Open Source, and Holding Space as a Leader

Ashley Willis has seen Developer Relations evolve from being on the sidelines of the tech team to having a seat at the strategy table. In her ten years in the space, she’s done more than give great conference talks or build community—she’s helped shape what the DevRel role looks like for software providers. Now as the Senior Director of Developer Relations at GitHub, Ashley is focused on building spaces where developers feel heard, seen, and supported. > “A decade ago, we were seen as amplifiers, not collaborators,” she says. “Now we’re influencing product roadmaps and shaping developer experience end to end.” DevRel Has Changed For Ashley, the biggest shift hasn’t been the work itself—but how it’s understood. > “The work is still outward-facing, but it’s backed by real strategic weight,” she explains. “We’re showing up in research calls and incident reviews, not just keynotes.” That shift matters, but it’s not the finish line. Ashley is still pushing for change when it comes to burnout, representation, and sustainable metrics that go beyond conference ROI. > “We’re no longer fighting to be taken seriously. That’s a win. But there’s more work to do.” Talking Less as a Leader When we asked what the best advice Ashley ever received, she shared an early lesson she received from a mentor: “Your presence should create safety, not pressure.” > “It reframed how I saw my role,” she says. “Not as the one with answers, but the one who holds the space.” Ashley knows what it’s like to be in rooms where it’s hard to speak up. She leads with that memory in mind, and by listening more than talking, normalizing breaks, and creating environments where others can lead too. > “Leadership is emotional labor. It’s not about being in control. It’s about making it safe for others to lead, too.” Scaling More Than Just Tech Having worked inside high-growth companies, Ashley knows firsthand: scaling tech is one thing. Scaling trust is another. > “Tech will break. Roadmaps will shift. But if there’s trust between product and engineering, between company and community—you can adapt.” And she’s learned not to fall for premature optimization. Scale what you have. Don’t over-design for problems you don’t have yet. Free Open Source Isn’t Free There’s one myth Ashley is eager to debunk: that open source is “free.” > “Open source isn’t free labor. It’s labor that’s freely given,” she says. “And it includes more than just code. There’s documentation, moderation, mentoring, emotional care. None of it is effortless.” Open source runs on human energy. And when we treat contributors like an infinite resource, we risk burning them out, and breaking the ecosystem we all rely on. > “We talk a lot about open source as the foundation of innovation. But we rarely talk about sustaining the people who maintain that foundation.” Burnout is Not Admirable Early in her career, Ashley wore burnout like a badge of honor. She doesn’t anymore. > “Burnout doesn’t prove commitment,” she says. “It just dulls your spark.” Now, she treats rest as productive. And she’s learned that clarity is kindness—especially when giving feedback. > “I thought being liked was the same as being kind. It’s not. Kindness is honesty with empathy.” The Most Underrated GitHub Feature? Ashley’s pick: personal instructions in GitHub Copilot. Most users don’t realize they can shape how Copilot writes, like its tone, assumptions, and context awareness. Her own instructions are specific: empathetic, plainspoken, technical without being condescending. For Ashley, that helps reduce cognitive load and makes the tool feel more human. > “Most people skip over this setting. But it’s one of the best ways to make Copilot more useful—and more humane.” Connect with Ashley Willis She has been building better systems for over a decade. Whether it’s shaping Copilot UX, creating safer teams, or speaking truth about the labor behind open source, she’s doing the quiet work that drives sustainable change. Follow Ashley on BlueSky to learn more about her work, her maker projects, and the small things that keep her grounded in a fast-moving industry. Sticker Illustration by Jacob Ashley....

Apr 18, 2025

3 mins

Engineering LeadershipGitHub

Let's innovate together!

We're ready to be your trusted technical partners in your digital innovation journey.

Whether it's modernization or custom software solutions, our team of experts can guide you through best practices and how to build scalable, performant software that lasts.

A Guide to Custom Angular Attribute Directives

What are Attribute Directives?

Creating Attribute Directives

Click Away Directive

Drag and Drop Directive

Conclusion

Jamie Kuppens

You might also like

Exploring Angular Forms: A New Alternative with Signals

Overview of the New Signal APIs in Angular

Integrating Playwright Tests into Your GitHub Workflow with Vercel

“We were seen as amplifiers, not collaborators,” Ashley Willis, Sr. Director of Developer Relations at GitHub, on How DevRel has Changed, Open Source, and Holding Space as a Leader

Let's innovate together!

You might also like

Exploring Angular Forms: A New Alternative with Signals

Overview of the New Signal APIs in Angular

Integrating Playwright Tests into Your GitHub Workflow with Vercel

“We were seen as amplifiers, not collaborators,” Ashley Willis, Sr. Director of Developer Relations at GitHub, on How DevRel has Changed, Open Source, and Holding Space as a Leader